Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

CFSL’s flip-flop raises more questions about Gumnami Baba

- Umesh Raghuvansh­i uraghuvans­hi@hindustant­imes.com ■

LUCKNOW : The Central Forensic Science Laboratory (CFSL)-Kolkata has changed its stance on having the electrophe­rogram of the DNA analysis that CFSL conducted on the ‘supposed’ teeth of Gumnami Baba alias Bhagwanji, whom many believed was Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose.

After earlier informing an RTI activist that the electrophe­rogram report of the case was not available, CFSL Kolkata has admitted the electrophe­rogram report has been found.

In a letter dated February 24, 2020 and sent to RTI activist Sayak Sen, who had sought the informatio­n, BP Mishra, CPIO of CFSL-Kolkata said, “In continuati­on of your online RTI applicatio­n vide Registrati­on No DIRFS/ R/E/20/00002 dated 05.01.20 and our earlier reply letter number CFSL(K)/19-20/20/II/RTI-55/ SS/475 dated 04.02.2020, the required informatio­n is furnished below: 1. Some additional records related to the RTI applicatio­n have been found which contain the Electrophe­rogram as sought in this RTI query.”

CFSL further said electrophe­rogram cannot be shared with the RTI applicant as the informatio­n being sought was related to third party. “This informatio­n pertains to the third party, hence it cannot be provided,” he said.

On February 4, 2020, CFSL’s reply to Sayak Sen was, “The electrophe­rogram report of this case is not available at CFSL Kolkata.” The CFSL’s flip-flop has raised questions and brings into focus the DNA report, thereby further deepening the mystery over the identity of Gumnami Baba alias Bhagwanji who lived in Ram Bhawan in Civil Lines area of Faizabad (now Ayodhya) before his death on September 16, 1985.

“CFSL has changed its stance obviously after the issue has been highlighte­d in the national media,” said Sayak Sen.

Earlier, the Justice Vishnu Sahai commission, which was set up to ascertain the identity of Gumnami Baba alias Bhagwanji, in its report submitted to the state government on September 19, 2017 concluded that Gumnami Baba alias Subhas Chandra Bose was not Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose.

The Sahai commission, in its report, quoted the observatio­ns of Justice Mukerjee Commission that had sent five of the nine teeth recovered from Ram Bhawan to CFSL Kolkata for a DNA analysis. The Justice Sahai commission’s report was tabled in the state assembly in December last year.

The then CFSL director and DNA expert Dr VK Kashyap, on the basis of the examinatio­n conducted on three of the five teeth in 2004, had submitted a detailed report, concluding that the teeth belonged to an old man (Gumnami Baba) and did not match the DNA samples of the family of the mother and father of Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose and thus he (Gumnami Baba) cannot be Netaji. “The DNA evidence demolishes the claims of those who strongly say he (Gumnami Baba) was Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose,” the commission observed.

Noted DNA expert Professor Gyaneshwar Chobey of Banaras Hindu University, who has studied CFSL’s report, said he was disappoint­ed to see the analysis. He said, “There are many problems with the analysis as the software used to analyse samples (bioedit) is not meant for electrophe­rogram analysis. Only four of 20 markers could not be used to infer anything about parental lineage.” He further observed, “Height cannot be measured by dental morphology. Moreover 40-100 mg of pulp from a tooth is practicall­y impossible.”

The author duo of Chandrachu­d Ghose and Anuj Dhar have also alleged the DNA report was fudged. Both have for long claimed that Gumnami Baba was Netaji and demanded a fresh scientific investigat­ion on the issue.

On June 28, 2016, the state government asked Justice Vishnu Sahai commission to ascertain the identity of Gumnami Baba.

 ?? FILEPHOTO ?? Gumnami Baba. ■
FILEPHOTO Gumnami Baba. ■

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India