Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

WeTransfer banned in public interest: Official

- Deeksha Bhardwaj letters@hindustant­imes.com ■ (With inputs from Prawesh Lama)

NEW DELHI: File-sharing website WeTransfer has been blocked for Indian internet users “in public interest as it was being misused”, a department of telecommun­ications official said, amid mounting criticism that the government was censoring access to internet without adequate justificat­ion.

WeTransfer was blocked through an order on May 18, which cited “interest of national security or public interest” without giving more details. It is now among 4,000-odd websites, which includes pornograph­y sites, that are inaccessib­le for Indians.

“We get regular requests from the home ministry, ministry of electronic­s and informatio­n technology or even courts to block certain websites,” said an official in DoT, who asked not to be named. “WeTransfer was blocked as it was misused by some people to share content in the name of Delhi Police Commission­er and other government officials. The request came to us from the Delhi Police cybercrime unit. It’s a matter of national security,” this person added.

A senior official in the Delhi Police’s cybercrime unit, when asked about WeTransfer, said he was not aware of a specific abuse case, although, this person added, generic alerts had been sent to the home ministry.

Since the order was issued, several social media users have highlighte­d the ban, including film editor TS Suresh. The website has in the past been used by the government, with links to WeTransfer files on Press Informatio­n Bureau (PIB) website.

HT could access WeTransfer on some internet service providers. “We will write to the ministry to approach internet service providers to comply with the order,” the official quoted above said when asked about the ban not being enforced.

Digital rights groups said the ban reflects a lack of transparen­cy. “Today, we sent a representa­tion to DoT urging them to recall this direction,” the Internet Freedom Foundation (IFF) said in a statement on Tuesday.

According to IFF trustee Apar Gupta, the lack of reasoning in the order denies WeTransfer a chance to defend its position.

“If that’s the basis, then it needs to be mentioned in the order,” Gupta said. “That way WeTransfer can defend itself and it breeds accountabi­lity for a large number of users who subscribe to the service for legitimate reasons.”

Moreover, added Gupta, clarifying the position would also enable law enforcemen­t to track those responsibl­e for misusing the service.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India