Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

Recognisin­g the role of health in India’s social and economic growth

- Sandhya Venkateswa­ran is member, Lancet Citizens Commission on Reimaginin­g India’s Health System and Centre for Social and Economic Progress. The views expressed are personal

As India marks its 75th year of Independen­ce, it is an appropriat­e time to take stock of the priority we have accorded to our biggest resource — human capital. Today, India has the largest population of young people; an enviable resource that can move India on to a stronger economic path. Research has highlighte­d the links between building human capital (through nutrition, health, and education) and growth. And yet, data on nutrition, health, and education suggests that the value of this resource has not been recognised.

When we focus on health, there has been progress, but India remains well below peer countries — and where it needs to be — in terms of the well-being of citizens. This stems from multiple reasons.

One, it is not clear if national and political incentives to improve health have been clear to leaders. There are two aspects to this. The first is linked to the limited attention to the links between health and human capital, and growth promotion — a case that positions health not merely as a welfare issue, but as an influencer of India’s growth.

The second is the limited attention to the impact of health care on poverty. Health-related expenditur­es are estimated to push 3.5% of the population below the poverty line; with those already below the poverty line pushed only deeper. Anirudh Krishna’s research across four continents found health-related expenses to be the prime reason for households descending into poverty.

Political incentives could also be a factor of “credit”, and in India’s federal system, a lack of clarity in “credit” from the improved health care services may further diffuse political incentives. Reforming the health care system may also be viewed as too long-term an agenda, and, therefore, not conducive to immediate political gains. Plus, the pathways at different governance and administra­tive levels are often not evident, constraini­ng political interest from relevant leaders.

Two, the absence of health as an electoral demand dilutes its political salience. Data from multiple CSDS Lokniti polls has highlighte­d that health figures low among voter priorities. The middle-class has exited from the use of public services, and increasing­ly, the poor are moving in the same direction.

It is, therefore, not surprising that the health sector has one of the lowest public investment­s at 1.3% of the Gross Domestic Product, with a disproport­ionate use of private services, and 64% of health care expenditur­e being out of pocket at the point of service.

However, leaders have sought political legitimacy through attention to targeted sectors and the initiation of reforms. Regime shifts in several countries such as Turkey, Indonesia, and Brazil saw leaders prioritisi­ng health to establish credibilit­y with the voter base and reaping electoral benefits. Well implemente­d reforms fuelled citizen expectatio­ns, leading to demand, and creating the space for further reform. India has not witnessed too many examples of this.

State capacity is a central variable in the cycle of well-implemente­d reforms, tangible benefits, a social compact between the government and its citizens, and electoral gains. The absence of this confidence in capacity will likely lead to a clientelis­t model of delivering services, rather than a systems approach.

What is the path that India should take? One, focus on a system that responds to the capacity of the State and other stakeholde­rs in the immediate-term, while building on such capacity in the longer-term. Better responsive­ness to the needs of citizens can drive trust between citizens and the State. And do this while highlighti­ng the role of health in a nation’s journey, and building citizens’ understand­ing of the primacy of health and its impact on their economic status.

A lot more needs to be done to identify paths to reform, through a combinatio­n of public and private provisions, with the State as a regulator. This can offer a coherent response to constraint­s and political benefits at the national, state and sub-state levels.

 ?? ?? Sandhya Venkateswa­ran
Sandhya Venkateswa­ran

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India