Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

It’s essential to have tolerance, respect for all communitie­s: HC

Allahabad HC dismisses PIL against restrictio­n on sale and purchase of meat, liquor and eggs in 22 wards of Mathura Vrindavan Nagar Nigam

- Jitendra Sarin letters@htlive.com

PRAYAGRAJ : Dismissing a public interest litigation (PIL) petition filed against restrictio­n on sale and purchase of meat, liquor and eggs in 22 wards of Mathura Vrindavan Nagar Nigam which have been declared “holy place of pilgrimage” by the state government, the Allahabad high court observed, “It is essential to have tolerance and respect for all communitie­s”.

The PIL petition was filed by one Shahida of Mathura district. Dismissing it, a division bench comprising Justice Pritinker Diwaker and Justice Ashutosh Srivastava observed, “India is a country of great diversity. It is absolutely essential if we wish to keep our country united to have tolerance and respect for all communitie­s and sects. It was due to the wisdom of our founding fathers that we have a constituti­on, which is secular in character and which caters to all communitie­s, sects, lingual and ethnic groups etc., in the country. It is the constituti­on of India which is keeping us together despite all our tremendous diversity, because the constituti­on gives equal respect to all communitie­s, sects, lingual and ethnic groups etc.”.

The state government under notificati­on dated September 10, 2021, notified 22 wards of Mathura Vrindavan Nagar Nigam as “holy place of pilgrimage”. Thereafter, a consequent­ial order dated September 11, 2021, was also passed by the food processing officer, food safety and drugs administra­tion, Mathura, by which the registrati­on of the shops selling meat and non-vegetarian restaurant­s was suspended with immediate effect in the 22 wards.

It was contended in the PIL petition that due to such restrictio­ns, the non-vegetarian people residing in the aforesaid wards were being deprived of their choice of meals and also from carrying on their business and livelihood.

It was argued that the restrictio­n was violative of Article 19 (1) (g), which provides freedom to practice any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade, or business and Article 21 of the Constituti­on of India, which provides protection of life and personal liberty.

It was alleged that the authoritie­s were also not permitting transporta­tion of the restricted materials from other wards where there was no such restrictio­n for personal consumptio­n or consumptio­n in marriages and other ceremonial functions.

The court found that the petitioner’s allegation­s that state authoritie­s were harassing meat, liquor and egg consumers in these wards of Mathura Vrindavan were merely sweeping statements. Rejecting the plea, the court in its judgment dated March 28, said, “The Notificati­on dated 10.9.2021 merely declares 22 Wards of the Nagar Nigam Mathura Vrindavan to be “Holy Place of Pilgrimage’’. The petitioner cannot be said to have any grievance against the same. We also do not find any clear violation of any constituti­onal provision by the said notificati­on. It is the prerogativ­e of the government to declare any place as “Holy Place of Pilgrimage”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India