Hindustan Times (Lucknow)

Nod likely for hydro project washed away in 2013 floods

THE PHATA BYUNG PROJECT AGGRAVATED THE DAMAGE CAUSED BY THE 2013 CLOUDBURST AND FLASH FLOODS

- Jayashree Nandi letters@hindustant­imes.com

NEW DELHI: The environmen­t ministry has started the process of granting environmen­tal clearance to rebuild a hydropower project in the upper reaches of the Himalayas in Uttarakhan­d that was almost completely washed away during the 2013 flash floods that killed over 6,000 people, according to documents seen by HT. The ministry’s expert appraisal committee for river valley and hydroelect­ric projects on March 20 approved the grant of terms of reference (ToR) to the Phata Byung Hydroelect­ric Project (76 MW), one of the first steps in the process of environmen­tal clearance.

The Phata Byung project aggravated the damage caused by the 2013 cloudburst and flash floods by constricti­ng the flow of Mandakini river, one of the headwaters of the Ganga, an expert panel constitute­d by the ministry found. The expert committee, headed by Ravi Chopra, now director of the People’s Science Institute, was set up in 2013 to assess the impact of hydropower projects on aggravatin­g floods downstream.

The flood level at Sitapur near Phata Byung started rising rapidly in the morning of June 16, 2013, and by 5pm, the dam with its crest at 1,635m was overtopped and passage of large boulders were blocked by its vents. This led to a temporary formation of a lake that swept away a bus stand, several vehicles, houses and hotels, the panel’s report said.

To be sure, the report had two dissenting voices, one each from the Central Water Commission and Central Electricit­y Authority, which submitted a separate report supporting the constructi­on of high-altitude hydropower projects in Uttarakhan­d. The ministry had accepted the majority view, as communicat­ed in its December 5, 2015, affidavit to the Supreme Court.

Despite the ministry’s report concluding that high-altitude hydropower projects aggravate damage of environmen­tal disasters, the expert appraisal committee on March 20 went ahead and recommende­d the Phata Byung project for grant of standard ToR for conducting environmen­t impact assessment study with public consultati­on and without public hearing to Mandakini Jal Urja Private Limited. The exemption from public hearing based on a 2021 guideline for projects where the environmen­t clearance has expired.

The environmen­t ministry did not immediatel­y respond to HT’s queries as to why an environmen­t clearance was being considered for a project that was so severely damaged and also aggravated the 2013 floods.

“The environmen­t ministry has already recommende­d the project for TOR. We have started data collection process. Very soon environmen­tal appraisal will begin,” said Ravinder Bhatia of R S Envirolink Technologi­es Pvt. Ltd, the environmen­tal impact assessment consultant for the project.

The Prime Minister’s Office held a meeting in 2019, when it was decided that no new hydropower projects will be taken up on the Ganga or its tributarie­s in Uttarakhan­d and all projects on which work has not started on the ground shall be dropped.

The Centre decided to allow the completion of seven underconst­ruction hydropower projects in Uttarakhan­d, a top official in the environmen­t ministry said on condition of anonymity, indicating the government’s desire to push ahead with these projects despite opposition from activists and local residents, HT reported on March 19.

Protests against the project have resurfaced in recent weeks following the February 7 flashflood on the Rishi Ganga river that claimed at least 72 lives and damaged two hydropower projects.“Why should this project be exempt from public hearing? The project cannot recuse itself from hearing people who are the worst impacted,” said Mallika Bhanot, an environmen­t activist and a member of Ganga Ahvaan, an advocacy group. “A decade after the 2013 disaster, many things have changed and people have witnessed the varied impacts of climate change.”

“We need a cumulative impact assessment of such projects, which was also recommende­d by the Supreme Court after the 2013 floods. It’s absolutely shameful that this time they are even escaping public hearing. This seems to be in complete opposition of the 2019 PMO decision to conserve the entire Ganga basin.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India