Hindustan Times (Patiala)

Aseemanand acquittal could hit other saffron terror cases

Witnesses turning hostile and slow probe have plagued most cases since the NDA government assumed power in May 2014

- Rajesh Ahuja letters@hindustant­imes.com

The acquittal of Swami Aseemanand and six others in the 2007 bombing at the Ajmer Sharif shrine in Rajasthan comes as no surprise.

More than three dozen witnesses out of 149 turned hostile or, in other words, refused to confirm to the court what they had earlier told the police and officers from the National Investigat­ion Agency (NIA).

Perhaps a similar fate awaits a spate of court cases involving Hindu extremists, including the bombing of the Samjhauta Express that killed 70 people in 2007. Dozens of witnesses in that case have already turned hostile in court.

In all, the NIA is investigat­ing seven cases in which Hindu rightwing groups are suspects. These cases — involving attacks where Muslims were targeted — were handed to the federal agency by the previous UPA government.

This is also when the NIA made most of the arrests, including that of Swami Aseemanand who faces charges in at least two other bomb attacks.

The other cases were the bombings in Maharashtr­a’s Muslim-dominated Malegaon town in 2006, blasts at Hyderabad’s Mecca Masjid the following year, and bomb attacks in Gujarat’s Modasa and Malegaon in 2008.

The seventh was the murder of former Hindu activist Sunil Joshi in Madhya Pradesh’s Dewas in 2007. Joshi’s murder investigat­ion was handed to the NIA as it was suspected that his killing was part of a larger Hindu right-wing conspiracy against Muslims.

After the NDA government assumed power in May 2014, the pace of investigat­ion has slackened in cases where the accused belonged to organisati­ons close to the BJP and the Rashtriya Swayamseva­k Sangh (RSS).

Such speculatio­n has been further fed by claims of the NIA’s former special public prosecutor, Rohini Salian, that she was asked to “go soft’’ on the investigat­ions into the 2008 Malegaon blast.

The first indication of change in the course of investigat­ions into these cases came when the Union home ministry under Rajnath Singh refused permission to the NIA to challenge a court order granting bail to two accused — Devender Gupta and Lokesh Sharma — in the Mecca Masjid blast case.

In August 2014, the NIA filed charges in Joshi’s murder against five accused, including Pragya Singh Thakur.

But the agency said his murder was not linked to any wider militant Hindutva conspiracy.

The agency said Joshi, considered the ring leader of Hindu extremists blamed for half a dozen blasts in the country, was killed by his own men as he misbehaved with Pragya Singh Thakur. Last month, a Madhya Pradesh court acquitted all the accused in the case.

In May last year, the Punjab and Haryana high court granted bail to Aseemanand, who is also the prime accused in the Samjhauta train bombing.

The next month, the government told Parliament that the NIA had decided not to challenge the bail order in the Supreme Court. Aseemanand is also an accused in the Hyderabad Mecca Masjid blast. Last May, the NIA let off Pragya Singh Thakur in the 2008 Malegaon bombings even though she had been formally charged by the Maharashtr­a Anti-Terrorism Squad seven years earlier.

The court is yet to approve the NIA’s decision to drop charges against Thakur.

 ?? HT FILE ?? Aseemanand being produced in court. He was acquitted, along with six others, in Ajmer Sharif blast case.
HT FILE Aseemanand being produced in court. He was acquitted, along with six others, in Ajmer Sharif blast case.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India