Hindustan Times (Patiala)

Reprieve for Jadhav, reproach for Pak

ICJ STAY Islamabad must not execute Kulbhushan, should give consular access

- Rezaul H Laskar letters@hindustant­imes.com n

NEW DELHI: Kulbhushan Jadhav gained a temporary reprieve on Thursday as the Internatio­nal Court of Justice ordered Pakistan not to execute the former Indian Navy officer convicted of alleged espionage and terrorism, rejecting Islamabad’s argument that the UN’s top legal body did not have jurisdicti­on in the case.

Pakistan sought to play down the significan­ce of the order, saying it amounted to maintainin­g “status quo” in Jadhav’s case and that it was determined to take the matter to its “logical end”. It added Jadhav “would be provided every opportunit­y and remedy” to defend his case and had “ample time to petition for clemency”.

Three days after India and Pakistan presented their arguments, Ronny Abraham, president of the United Nations’ highest court in The Hague, read out the order: “Pakistan shall take all measures at its disposal to ensure that Mr Jadhav is not executed pending the final decision in these proceeding­s and shall inform the court of all the measures taken in implementa­tion of the present order.”

External affairs ministry spokespers­on Gopal Baglay said the order was “unanimous, clear and unambiguou­s” and would will help remedy the violation of Jadhav’s rights. He noted the ICJ’s order was internatio­nally binding.

However, the ICJ has no means to enforce its rulings and they have sometimes been ignored.

In “provisiona­l measures” adopted unanimousl­y, the 12-judge tribunal said it would remain “seized of the matters” in its order until it gives a final judgment. At the hearing on Monday, India described Jadhav’s trial as a “serious miscarriag­e of justice” because Indian diplomats were not granted consular access to him and he wasn’t allowed to choose his defence lawyer. India argued these restrictio­ns amounted to a breach of the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations.

Pakistan claimed the ICJ did not have the jurisdicti­on to take up Jadhav’s case as it was a “national security” issue, and that the court did not need to issue an order to stay the execution because it wasn’t imminent.

However, the ICJ concluded on Thursday it had “prima facie jurisdicti­on” as Pakistan’s “alleged failure” to provide consular notificati­ons about the arrest and to allow communicat­ion and provide access to him fell within the scope of the Vienna Convention.

India’s contention about the violation of Jadhav’s rights to consular access “are plausible”, the ICJ added.

The ICJ order has come as a great relief to the family of Kulbhushan Jadhav and people of India. SUSHMA SWARAJ, External affairs minister

 ?? AP PHOTO ?? Friends and wellwisher­s of former Indian naval officer Kulbhushan Jadhav celebrate the ICJ order in Mumbai on Thursday.
AP PHOTO Friends and wellwisher­s of former Indian naval officer Kulbhushan Jadhav celebrate the ICJ order in Mumbai on Thursday.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India