Hindustan Times (Patiala)

Sebi finds no violation of norms at Tata firms

Regulator was investigat­ing charges levelled by Mistry

- Jayshree P Upadhyay

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) has closed its investigat­ion into allegation­s raised by Cyrus Mistry about violations at various Tata companies, two people with direct knowledge of the matter said. With this, the regulator has addressed two of the allegation­s raised by Mistry.

After Mistry was ousted as chairman of the group’s holding company Tata Sons Ltd on October 24, he wrote to the board alleging governance lapses and mismanagem­ent, insider trading and violations of various Sebi rules at some of the listed Tata companies.

Subsequent­ly, Nusli Wadia a former independen­t director on the boards of Tata Steel, Tata Motors and Tata Chemical Ltd, wrote to Sebi in January, alleging that four individual­s on the boards of the three companies had conflicts of interest and should not have been appointed as independen­t directors.

Following the allegation­s, Sebi started a probe pertaining to the alleged compliance violations, insider trading and the role of independen­t directors.

In January, Sebi ruled that Tata group companies sharing informatio­n with chairman emeritus Ratan Tata did not amount to a violation of insider trading norms.

It is now clear that it has concluded that the allegation­s aired by Tata Sons’ former chairman were not lapses in compliance but commercial decisions taken by the companies, the people said on condition of anonymity.

“On the basis of replies and documents provided by the companies, it appears that the allegation­s primarily question the com- mercial decisions and the replies of the companies on the same are acceptable,” one of the two persons said.

A Sebi spokespers­on did not respond to an e-mail seeking comment.

In December, Sebi asked Tata Power Co Ltd, Tata Motors Ltd, Tata Steel Ltd and Indian Hotels Co Ltd via stock exchanges to reply to the allegation­s of compliance violations through their audit committees.

“The audit committees submitted their reports to Sebi in April, stating that there is no violation or non-compliance with various provisions of Sebi Act,” said the second person.

“The audit committees of the respective companies have concluded that all applicable corporate governance norms were followed. The respective companies in their annual reports have carried appropriat­e disclosure­s that the allegation­s made by Mr. Mistry were incorrect,” said a spokespers­on for Tata Sons in an emailed response.

All the companies have refuted the allegation­s in their annual reports. This was first reported by The Economic Times on 1 August.

Sebi has sought informatio­n from Tata group companies on whether some independen­t directors on the board of Tata group companies were qualified to become independen­t directors.

“We...are committed to satisfying the Sebi on any corporate governance queries. All Independen­t Directors are compliant with all legal requiremen­ts of independen­ce,” the spokespers­on for Tata Sons wrote in the emailed response.

 ?? PTI/FILE ?? Cyrus Mistry (right) and Ratan Tata. After Mistry was ousted as chairman of Tata Sons on October 24, he wrote to the board of the group holding company alleging governance lapses
PTI/FILE Cyrus Mistry (right) and Ratan Tata. After Mistry was ousted as chairman of Tata Sons on October 24, he wrote to the board of the group holding company alleging governance lapses

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India