Hindustan Times (Patiala)

HC notice to Haryana, UPSC on Vijender’s plea

- HT Correspond­ent letterschd@hindustant­imes.com

CHANDIGARH: The Punjab and Haryana high court on Friday put Haryana government on notice on the plea of Vijender Singh, a district town and country planner, seeking vacation of stay imposed by Central Administra­tive Tribunal (CAT) on the nomination process.

The high court bench of justice AK Mittal and justice Amit Rawal also asked the government as to why the CAT order should not be stayed. Any decision taken by Union Public Service Commission (UPSC), New Delhi, shall be subject to further orders to be passed by this court, the high court said. The matter will now be taken up on January 11.

In November, Haryana government shortliste­d the names of the kin of the state BJP leaders to fill up one Indian Administra­tive Service (IAS) seat from among the five none-state civil service officers.

Vijender Singh had argued that the selection process should be hampered since it had to be completed by December 31, 2017.

Earlier this month, CAT had stayed the process on plea of Surender Singh Dahiya, additional director of Haryana’s agricultur­al department who had demanded that recommenda­tions of the screening committee for appointmen­t be set aside. The main contention was that Asha Sharma, medical officer, who happens to be daughter of education minister Ram Bilas Sharma, was not eligible and did not qualify or fulfil the criteria of having an “outstandin­g record for the past five years” as per rules and regulation­s of the IAS Regulation­s, 1997. Yet, her name was recommende­d. CAT had stayed process on December 4.

Those shortliste­d include Dr Asha Sharma, and Lajpat Rai, 56, brother of Santosh Yadav, deputy speaker Vidhan Sabha, who are at the first and second position. Other three candidates in the fray are Parveen Sethi (director dental health services); Dr Rakesh Talwar (in-charge of health facilities at Haryana Raj Bhawan); and Vijender Singh, the petitioner. Sethi too has approached the high court.

ASKS GOVT AS TO WHY THE CAT ORDER SHOULD NOT BE REVOKED; NEXT HEARING ON JANUARY 11

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India