Hindustan Times (Patiala)

CBI arrests Karti in INX case, Cong says vendetta

- Rajesh Ahuja and Azaan Javaid letters@hindustant­imes.com

The Central Bureau of Investigat­ion (CBI) on Wednesday arrested Karti Chidambara­m for allegedly helping INX Media in scuttling punitive action by the finance ministry during the tenure of his father P Chidambara­m as Union finance minister.

The arrest triggered a political battle, with Congress terming it a “vendetta” and the BJP insisting that “law is taking its course”.

The 46-year-old was produced before metropolit­an magistrate Sumeet Anand, who remanded Karti to a day’s CBI custody for interrogat­ion, though the agency had asked for 15-day custody. The magistrate asked the agency to apply again before the regular CBI judge, who was on leave.

When he was brought to the Patiala House court complex, Karti said: “It is absolutely a political vendetta. I will be vindicated.” In the court, too, his lawyer and senior Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi took the same line and said the basis for his client’s arrest were “bizarre” and “fake”.

The CBI has alleged that INX Media, then owned by Indrani and Peter Mukerjea, received ₹305 crore from offshore entities by way of Foreign Direct Investment without an approval from the Foreign Investment Promotion Board (FIPB), which has now been disbanded.

The CBI’s FIR states that when the income-tax department launched a probe into the alleged violation, the Mukerjeas sought help from Karti to get the punitive action against them by the finance ministry scuttled. The CBI alleged that Karti’s companies got ₹3.5 crore from INX for services rendered.

Asked why the CBI was arresting Karti almost nine months after the registrati­on of FIR in the case in May, 2017, the agency’s counsel VK Sharma told the court: “On February 17, an accused in the case recorded a statement in front of the magistrate stating that Karti Chidamabar­am asked for $1million in foreign currency to clear the FIPB case.”

A CBI official familiar with the developmen­ts said that the counsel was referring to Indrani Mukerjea, who was questioned by the agency in the first week of February.

She then recorded the statement before a magistrate under Section 164 of the Criminal Procedure Code, said the officer who asked not to be named.

An officer in the Enforcemen­t Directorat­e (ED), which is probing the money laundering angle in the case, said that Indrani had recorded another statement with the agency in which certain references were made about Karti and his father P Chidambara­m.

Though HT was shown the statement, it could not independen­tly verify its authentici­ty. P Chidambara­m was not immediatel­y available for comments.

The CBI counsel said in court that Karti did not cooperate with the agency in the probe.

 ?? SUSHIL KUMAR/HT ?? Karti Chidambara­m outside Patiala House Court Complex in New Delhi.
SUSHIL KUMAR/HT Karti Chidambara­m outside Patiala House Court Complex in New Delhi.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India