Govt’s signal to Dalits: Back to old SC/ST law GOVT MAY CLEAR 2 NAMES FOR SC, SIT ON JUSTICE JOSEPH FILE
Bill undoing changes made by top court to be tabled in Parliament
Facing protests by Dalit groups, opposition parties and even ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) allies, the Union cabinet on Wednesday approved a bill to restore key provisions of the Scheduled Caste and Scheduled Tribe (Prevention of Atrocities) Act that were struck down by the Supreme Court in March.
Union minister of consumer affairs, food and public distribution, Ram Vilas Paswan, who is also a prominent Dalit leader and president of the Lok Janshakti Party, announced the decision and said the bill would be tabled in Parliament during the ongoing monsoon session.
On March 20, the top court had barred automatic arrests under the act, mandated preliminary inquiries before first information reports (FIRs) are registered, and said there would be no bar on anticipatory bail.
The judgment triggered widespread protests by Dalit groups, which argued that the verdict had diluted the law meant to protect the marginalised communities from crime and discrimination.
“Central Cabinet under the leadership of Hon’ble Prime Minister took a historical decision today that important
changes will be made in the SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 to restore the status as it was prior to the decision of Supreme Court dated 20/3/2018,” Paswan tweeted soon after the decision.
At a press conference, law minister Ravi Shankar Prasad refused to give details of the amendments because issues related to bills and other policy decisions cannot be announced outside Parliament when the House is in session. But Paswan tweeted the three main provisions proposed in the amendments, which included no prior inquiry before registering an FIR, no permission required before arrests, and no provision for anticipatory arrests.
“We expect it (the bill) will be passed with consensus ... Whoever opposes will be vanquished .” Pas want old news agency IANS.
Since a nationwide protest by Dalit groups on April 2 that left nine people dead across three states, pressure has built on the BJP to restore the 1989 law to its original form. BJP allies such as the LJP, Rashtriya Lok Samata Party, Republican Party of India (Athawale) and the Janata Dal (United) too joined the chorus against changes in the bill. The allies also questioned the appointment of justice AK Goel, who was part of the two-member bench that pronounced the verdict, as the chairperson of the National Green Tribunal.
Last week, Dalit groups announced a nationwide protest on August 9 demanding that the government reverse the SC order.
The BJP has made several overtures to the Dalits, who make up about 16% of the country’s population, to allay concerns of the community and disprove allegations that its government was anti-Dalit, ahead of the 2019 general election.
The Centre filed a review petition in the Supreme Court and several ministers have held out assurances that they would not let the Act get diluted.
The law was first enacted in 1989 and strengthened in 2015, when caste slurs were also brought under its ambit.
The government is planning to clear the appointment of two high court chief justices, Indira Banerjee and Vineet Sharan, to the Supreme Court in the coming week, but not that of Justice KM Joseph , a top government functionary said on Wednesday on condition of anonymity. The SC collegium recommended the two new names and sent its recommendation again on Joseph to the law ministry on July 16.
A second government functionary, while confirming the development, said the law ministry had moved the file of the two judges to the Prime Minister’s Office for final clearance. While Justice Banerjee heads the Madras HC, Justice Sharan is the CJ of the Orissa HC. Law minister Ravi Shankar Prasad declined to comment.
The collegium, a body of the SC’s top five judges headed by the CJI that appoints judges to the higher judiciary, first recommended justice Joseph’s elevation to the top court (he is currently chief justice of the Uttarakhand HC) in January. In April, law minister Prasad wrote to CJI Dipak Misra asking for reconsideration of the decision (communicated in January) to appoint Justice Joseph. The law minister said Justice Joseph was at No. 42 in the all India seniority list of HC judges.