Hindustan Times (Patiala)

NGT asks Punjab govt to probe felling of over 24,000 trees

Trees were felled along Bist Doab Canal; tribunal asks irrigation dept to fix responsibi­lity of 2 officials, including principal chief conservato­r of forests

- Gurpreet Singh Nibber gurpreet.nibber@hindustant­imes.com n

The National Green Tribunal (NGT) on Monday directed the Punjab government to order an inquiry by an officer of not less than the rank of additional chief secretary into felling of 24,777 trees along the Bist Doab Canal (BDC) and its distributa­ries in 2016.

The trees were felled for strengthen­ing of canal and road constructi­on. HT had then broke the news of illegal felling of these trees.

The NGT has asked the state irrigation department to carry out compensato­ry afforestat­ion over an equivalent area of nonforest land and also pay for its maintenanc­e for five years.

The tribunal also asked the department to fix the responsibi­lity of the two officials – the then principal chief conservato­r of forests (PCCF) and the then divisional forest officer (DFO), Nawanshahr – for ignoring the provisions of the Forest (Conservati­on) Act, 1980. At that time, Kuldeep Kumar was the PCCF and Jagdev Singh was DFO. The latter has already retired.

The NGT said the then PCCF had said that “the trees were planted in an unauthoris­ed manner on irrigation department land over the years to which no one objected. It is not forest area. Only 24,000 trees on non-forest area are being felled. An equal number of trees on forest land along the canal are not being touched”.

It adds that PCCF had directed conservato­r of forest, Shivalik circle, Hoshiarpur, and the DFO Nawanshahr on January 22, 2016, to initiate action for removal of trees as per marking of trees prepared by the DFO. In Nawanshahr district, trees were felled over 58.56 hectares and in Jalandhar over 48.69 hectares.

The PCCF had chosen to overlook the objection of conservato­r of forests, Shivalik circle, Hoshiarpur, who clearly stated that the felling of trees in the area will attract penal provisions of the 1980 Act and a prior approval of the environmen­t and forests ministry was required to be sought, says the NGT order.

The order said, “All lands on either side of BDC, including its distributa­ries, and minor escapes and bunds clearly fall within the protected forests, irrespecti­ve of the fact that these are lands under the ownership of irrigation department. Therefore, the trees have been felled in violation of provisions of the Forest Conservati­on Act, 1980.”

It further said, “The entire case may be investigat­ed by an officer not below the rank of additional chief secretary to fix the responsibi­lity of officers who are responsibl­e for violation of Forest (Conservati­on) Act-1980 and take strict action in accordance with the law.”

‘TOOK ACTION AFTER CLARIFICAT­ION FROM MINISTRY’

Talking to HT, then PCCF Kuldeep Kumar, who now holds the charge as PCCF (wildlife), said, “I have not received the orders yet. We took action at that time after receiving clarificat­ion from the (environmen­t and forests) ministry and the entire record is with the department.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India