‘Fake news’ law takes effect
Singapore’s new law to combat “fake news” came into effect on Wednesday despite criticism from tech giants and activists, who called the rules a “chilling” attempt to stifle dissent.
The law gives government ministers powers to order social media sites to put warnings next to posts authorities deem to be false, and in extreme cases get them taken down.
Authorities in the tightly controlled country - long criticised for restricting civil liberties -insist the measures are necessary to stop the circulation of falsehoods that could sow divisions in society and erode trust in institutions.
S Iswaran, minister for communications and information, insisted the law was “not so much about controlling free speech”.
“We share the common objective of wanting to allow people to engage on social media platforms... in order to have that contest of ideas,” he said, in an interview with CNBC.
Facebook, Twitter and Google -who have their Asian headquarters in Singapore - were given temporary exemptions from a handful of provisions in the act to give them time to adapt.
If an action is judged to be malicious and damaging to Singapore’s interests, companies could be hit with fines of up to Singapore dollar 1 million ($720,000), while individuals could face jail terms of up to 10 years.
But the laws have sparked outrage from rights groups, who fear they could stifle online discussion, tech companies and media organisations. Activists fear the legislation could also be used to crack down on dissent in the runup to a general election in Singapore, expected within months, and there are concerns it could erode academic freedoms.
Journalist and activist Kirsten Han, who is the editor-in-chief of independent media outlet New Naratif, said the legislation was “extremely worrying”.
“It’s such a broad law that it’s hard to predict how it’s going to be applied. What’s of immediate concern is the chilling effect and the further entrenchment of selfcensorship,” she told AFP.
Critics are especially concerned it will be up to authorities alone to judge what is “fake news”, but the government insists any decision can be challenged in the courts.