Hindustan Times (Patiala)

HC stays suspension of co-op societies’ additional registrar

- HT Correspond­ent letterschd@hindustant­imes.com

CHANDIGARH: The Punjab and Haryana high court has stayed suspension order of additional registrar, cooperativ­e societies, Punjab, Harinder Singh Sidhu, in an alleged financial bungling case.

The order was passed by the bench of justice Rajiv Sharma and justice HS Sidhu on a plea filed by Sidhu challengin­g a single judge order, which had refused to stay the suspension order.

“Prima facie, the suspension of the appellant from retrospect­ive effect is not permissibl­e as per the existing rules. Accordingl­y, there shall be stay of the impugned order…till the next date of hearing,” the division bench said while seeking response from the state government by November 7.

ADDL REGISTRAR WAS SUSPENDED IN JUNE

Sidhu was suspended on June 13 by cooperatio­n minister Sukhjinder Singh Randhawa on allegation­s that he committed financial bungling by getting works done to the tune of ₹45 lakh without tendering and proper sanction during 2016-17 and 2017-18 while serving as the managing director of Punjab State Agricultur­al Developmen­t Bank.

The decision was followed by his dismissal on September 4, which was subsequent­ly withdrawn by the government. However, an order was issued on September 20 stating that his suspension would continue. Sidhu had challenged this decision and a single judge, on September 26, issued notice to the government, but refused to stay the order.

The judge had observed that if a competent authority has passed an order, which is otherwise well within his competence, it cannot fail on the ‘specious plea’ that it has been passed under a wrong provision.

CONTINUATI­ON OF SUSPENSION CHALLENGED

Before the division bench, Sidhu had argued that there is no question of continuati­on of suspension.

“Once a dismissal order is passed, the order of suspension then ceases to exist, as it merges into the dismissal order. A subsequent withdrawal of the dismissal order, therefore, cannot revive the earlier non-existent suspension order,” he had argued before the court.

THE OFFICIAL WAS SUSPENDED ON JUNE 13 ON ALLEGATION­S OF FINANCIAL BUNGLING

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India