Hindustan Times (Patiala)

SANGH-AKAL TAKHT DISCORD RESURFACES

- Smriti Kak Ramachandr­an letters@hindustant­imes.com

NEW DELHI: A call by the Akal Takht, or throne of the timeless, this week for a ban on the Rashtriya Swayamseva­k Sangh (RSS) has revived the simmering discord between the highest temporal authority of Sikhism and the RSS, the ideologica­l mentor of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. The provocatio­n for Tuesday’s demand by the acting head of the Akak Takht, Giani Harpreet Singh was RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat’s remark that India was a “Hindu Rashtra.”

A call by the Akal Takht, or throne of the timeless, this week for a ban on the Rashtriya Swayamseva­k Sangh (RSS) has revived the simmering discord between the highest temporal authority of Sikhism and the RSS, the ideologica­l mentor of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party.

The provocatio­n for Tuesday’s demand by the acting head of the Akak Takht, Giani Harpreet Singh was RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat’s remark that India was a “Hindu Rashtra.” RSS hasn’t responded directly to the ban call although its affiliate, the Rashtriya Sikh Sangat, said the Takht has miscontrue­d Bhagwat’s comments.

In his annual Vijaydasha­mi speech in Nagpur last week, Bhagwat said that in the view of the Sangh, the word Hindu was not confined to just those who call themselves Hindus.

“…Those who belong to Bharat, those of who are descendant­s of Bharatiya ancestors, those who are working for the ultimate glory of the nation and joining hands in enhancing peace by mingling with each other and accepting, respecting and welcoming all diversitie­s; all those Bharatiyas are Hindus,” he said.

The Takht, one of the five seats of Sikhism, perceived his statement as an indication of the Sangh’s intention of subsuming the Sikh identity with that of the Hindus. This isn’t the first such confrontat­ion.In 2017, the two sides faced off against each other when the Akal Takht called for the boycott of an event held by the Rashtriya Sikh Sangat to mark the 350th birth anniversar­y of Guru Gobind Singh, the tenth Sikh guru. The motives attributed to Bhagwat’s speech by the Akal Takht are specious because the RSS chief referred to Hinduism as a way of life, said GS Gill, national president of the Sangat. “In 1996 the Supreme Court also said Hindutva cannot be confined only to the strict Hindu religious practices; it is a way of life.”

On the 2017 conflict between the Sangh and the Takht, Gill said the statements made by the Takht were political in nature and the grounds for disagreeme­nt were unfounded. “Guru Gobind Singh is known as the Jagat Guru so it should be a matter of pride for us if other people want to celebrate his birth anniversar­y,” Gill said.

A senior RSS functionar­y said on condition of anonymity that periodic outbursts against the Sangh were designed to “discredit” the organisati­on.

While the Sangh has a limited presence in Punjab, it relies on the Sangat to build bridges with the Sikh community in the state and in neighbouri­ng Haryana and Rajasthan. In these states the Sangh has expressed concern over “forced conversion­s” being carried out by missionari­es, especially in the border areas.

Of late, the RSS has also expressed concern over the resurgence of the Khalistani movement in Punjab. It pointed to a charge sheet filed by the National Investigat­ion Agency against 11 men for the killing of an RSS worker, Ravinder Gosain, in Ludhaina in 2017.

Both Gill and the RSS functionar­y cited above said the Sangh considered Sikhism, Buddhism and Jainism as separate religions. “Statements to incite difference­s between Hindus and Sikhs are par for the course ahead of the so-called Referendum 2020.Therefore, the RSS does not want to comment on these statements,” a second Sangh functionar­y said. Referendum 2020 is a secessioni­st campaign organised by the US-based Sikhs For Justice to assess if Sikhs across at least 20 countries want a separate homeland of their own.

Commenting on the difference­s of opinion, SS Jodhka, professor of sociology at Jawaharlal Nehru University, said: “To club Sikhs with a larger Hindu identity is unnecessar­y; even the Khalistan movement was not supported by the larger Sikh community who take pride in being nationalis­ts.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India