Hindustan Times (Patiala)

High court irked over delay in filing of cancellati­on reports

Makes the disposal process time-bound for investigat­ors as well as courts

- Surender Sharma surender.sharma@hindustant­imes.com

CHANDIGARH: The Punjab and Haryana high court has come down heavily on prosecutio­n agencies for dillydally­ing over the filing of cancellati­on and untraced reports in criminal cases. Now, the high court has made the disposal process timebound for investigat­ors as well as courts.

“The legitimate expectatio­n that cancellati­on/untraced reports will be filed by the police and disposed of by the courts/ magistrate­s without any undue delay is frustrated not by any shortage of infrastruc­ture or men power but by causes attributab­le to apathy, neglect, lack of coordinati­on and proper management, and giving of due attention with requisite determinat­ion of serving the cause of justice for all. The cause of justice suffers by delay in filing of cancellati­on/untraced reports by the police and disposal of the same by courts/magistrate­s,” the bench of justice Arun Kumar

Tyagi observed, issuing a slew of directions to police and judicial officers.

The directions came in a criminal case registered in 2016, where proceeding­s were held up even as the cancellati­on report had been filed, but the complainan­t party had gone abroad.

From data submitted in the high court, it had come to light that till January 1, 2021 as many as 25,677 cases were pending for investigat­ion for a period of more than one year in Punjab, 7,598 cases in Haryana and 508 cases in Chandigarh.

The data also revealed that till January 1, 2021, there were 13,872 cancellati­on/untraced reports prepared but not approved by the superior officers in Punjab; 21,621 cancellati­on reports and 44,371 untraced reports pending before officers in Haryana and 97 cancellati­on reports and 265 untraced reports pending before officers in Chandigarh for their approval for submission before court.

There were 10,386 cases in Punjab, where officers had given the go-ahead to submit reports in court, but the needful had not been done; in Haryana’s case 41,147 cancellati­on reports and 82,856 untraced reports were found such where officers had cleared the reports, but not filed. In Chandigarh, 312 such cancellati­on and 1,390 untraced reports were found.

In Punjab, reports had been filed in 8,669 cases, but were pending considerat­ion of the judicial officer. In Haryana’s case 221 cancellati­on and 152 untraced reports were pending before judicial officers and Chandigarh had 74 cancellati­on reports and 483 untraced reports pending before courts. Some cases were found pending since 2009, before police or courts. Now, the DGPs of both the states and Chandigarh have been asked to issue instructio­ns for timely filing of these reports.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India