Hindustan Times (Patiala)

Watershed moment for S Asian representa­tion?

- Aroh Akunth Aroh Akunth is an artist and writer currently in Germany. The views expressed are personal.

Kathani Sharma in Bridgerton. Kamala Khan in Ms Marvel. Arooj Aftab winning big at the Grammys. Pakistani film Joyland lifting the jury prize at Cannes Film Festival. By most accounts, 2022 has been a watershed year for South Asian representa­tion in western pop culture. As a subcontine­nt that houses nearly a fourth of the world’s population, this burst in seeing “brown bodies” on screen has been a long time coming.

Representa­tion is important, especially one that is affirming, authentic and nuanced — it can improve the self-esteem and confidence of communitie­s, help them battle prejudices and can change the mindset of dominant groups in removing rigid stereotype­s.

The demand for representa­tion comes from a position of deprivatio­n — communitie­s that are historical­ly over-represente­d in TV, movies and popular culture are also usually the ones with the most social power (white people, men, caste-elites, for instance) Hence, any honest movement towards representa­tion must be tied to an affirmatio­n of civil rights — more women on screen leading to equal pay for actors of all genders in one case. The casting of Canadian-Pakistani actor Iman Vellani as Ms Marvel, for example, gives birth to a portrayal not only light and funny, but also rooted and honest. Unfortunat­ely, in some cases, demands of representa­tion are also used to blunt demands of parity in walks of life other than entertainm­ent or gloss over discrimina­tion and violation in other aspects (for example, queer rights movements demanding better access to anti-discrimina­tion laws and not only token characters in movies and shows). This also means that substantiv­ely what is celebrated as representa­tion might have little to do with the wellbeing of the population­s being represente­d.

Think of the poorly researched character of Sharma that amalgamate­s multiple Indian cultures — a north Indian woman calls her father “Appa” and her sister “Bon (Bengali for sister)” and invokes Mirza Ghalib in an era he certainly couldn’t have written. Clearly, the character only responds to an urgent need on the maker’s part to translate an Indian character for a western audience without pondering on the need for the characters, and how they add to the story, even transform it.

Simone Ashley’s casting as a dark-skinned actress of South Asian descent as Sharma is path-breaking against the backdrop of systemic racism and colonialis­m in America, but in the South Asian context, must also be tied to the parallel and, in some ways much more potent, rigid and older institutio­n of caste and the biases of colour. In the Indian entertainm­ent industry, such biases keep people with darker colour and those from marginalis­ed caste background­s — and often, the two are seen as the same by many sections of people who believe higher caste births are connected to fairer skin — out of leading roles and influentia­l positions. Hence, representa­tion is tied to structural realities in society and only superficia­l movement on the former will not be helpful to improve the latter.

Sharma, Khan, Aftab are all landmark moments. There is much to celebrate in the achievemen­ts of the people who have made it possible for a generation of South Asian people to see stories that resemble theirs on the big and small screens. But the quest for representa­tion is forever in progress, as is the march for rights. Here’s hoping for more diverse, rooted and just portrayals of people who cannot even imagine such a future today.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India