Hindustan Times (Patiala)

How Benin got its bronzes back

- Rachel Lopez rachel.lopez@htlive.com

When British soldiers sacked the Kingdom of Benin (in present-day Nigeria) in 1897, they took from the royal palace as many as 10,000 ornamental artefacts dating to the mid-16th and early 17th centuries. Those objects, collective­ly known as the Benin bronzes, have since been scattered across Europe and the US, in museums and private collection­s.

The bronzes are beautiful. They show fine craftsmans­hip, portraying representa­tions of the oba (king), the queen mother, and courtiers, and are an important part of Africa’s cultural heritage.

Scholars estimate that European colonisers and explorers have violently looted at least 5,000 objects of historic and cultural significan­ce from the continent. Nigeria, which gained independen­ce from the UK in 1960, has campaigned long and hard for the return of its treasures. These efforts offer valuable lessons for India.

Formal requests to return the items began in the 1960s, but museums ignored them. In 1973, Mobutu Sese Seko, thenpresid­ent of Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of the Congo), addressed the United Nations and denounced the “barbarous, systematic pillaging” of Africa’s artefacts. Twelve African nations signed his draft resolution. Every Western country in the UN rejected it. They objected to the term “restitutio­n”, they said.

Western museum curators were openly racist. Friedrich Kussmaul, director of Stuttgart’s Linden Museum at the time, publicly stated that African museologis­ts and administra­tors were too corrupt and not educated enough to manage their own heritage. He had never visited Africa.

Meanwhile, Benin-era objects freely turned up at auction. At a Sotheby’s sale in 1980, Nigeria paid half a million pounds to acquire several pieces of its own heritage. Official return requests were ignored until 2007, when the UN urged the West to restore the “cultural, intellectu­al, religious and spiritual property” taken from indigenous people “without their consent and in violation of local customs”.

In 2010, the Benin Dialogue Group was establishe­d to liaise between European museum delegates and Nigerian authoritie­s. Requests were now aimed at specific objects, museums and foreign ministries. The Group built a permanent showcase for returned items in Nigeria’s Benin City.

France had, for decades, cited an obscure 1566 law on “inherited objects” as its reason for not returning artefacts. Then, in 2018, President Emmanuel Macron appointed a committee to look into African collection­s and their provenance. The report recommende­d full restitutio­n of items “acquired amorally”. It was the push the movement needed. By 2020, France passed a bill for a phased return of 26 items looted from Benin in 1892.

Some objects, including palace doors, thrones and warrior staffs, were handed over late last year. In February, after pressure from students, the UK’s Jesus College at Cambridge University returned a bronze rooster and the bust of a king to Nigeria.

The US has followed suit; the Smithsonia­n Institutio­n has pledged to return most of its collection of 39 Benin bronzes. Germany, which holds more than 500 Benin objects, plans to return the bulk of them starting next year. The British Museum, however, has no plans to part with its collection. It cites the British Museums Act of 1963, which prevents it from permanentl­y removing objects from its collection­s.

While Nigeria has been asking for its looted Benin bronzes back since the 1960s, it is only in 2020 that Europe and the US began to return them. The ones at left were returned by France. The British Museum is still holding out.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? IMAGES: QUAI BRANLY MUSEUM ??
IMAGES: QUAI BRANLY MUSEUM

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India