Hindustan Times ST (Jaipur)

HC reserves order on PIL against collegium recommenda­tions

- Press Trust of India letters@hindustant­imes.com

PETITIONER SAID THE COLLEGIUM SYSTEM FOR RECOMMENDI­NG APPOINTMEN­TS WAS ‘UNCONSTITU­TIONAL’

NEW DELHI: The Delhi high court on Monday reserved its verdict on a plea challengin­g its single judge bench order rejecting a petition to restrain the Supreme Court collegiums from recommendi­ng appointmen­ts to the higher judiciary.

“You (petitioner) file your written submission­s. We will consider it and pass an order,” a bench of chief justice G Rohini and justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal said.

Delhi-based lawyer RP Luthra, who has filed the plea, told the bench he was not arguing for removing the judges who were recently elevated to the apex court.

“I am not for removing judges. This is not my grievance. I have come here for protection of my fundamenta­l rights which are given to me under the Constituti­on. Fundamenta­l rights of the citizens have to be protected. I am against the system which is in function,” he told the bench.

He alleged that the collegium system for recommendi­ng appointmen­ts to the higher judiciary was “unconstitu­tional”.

During the hearing, when the petitioner argued that his fundamenta­l right was violated, the bench asked, “Tell us how your fundamenta­l rights have been violated.”

Responding to this, he said the recommenda­tion of the collegium was not transparen­t as only some of the lawyers were considered for elevation.

Additional solicitor general Sanjay Jain said all the lawyers cannot be considered to be appointed as judges in the higher judiciary.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India