Hindustan Times ST (Jaipur)

ST panel smells rat in jobs doled out for Rourkela steel plant land

- Smriti Kak Ramachandr­an letters@hindustant­imes.com

Authoritie­s informed the government that employment had been offered to 6,000. But only 3,000 were found to have been employed. Among them, many had no links to the displaced families.

The National Commission for Scheduled Tribes (NCST) is all set to examine whether the Rourkela Steel Plant (RSP) gave jobs meant for tribals whose land has been acquired for setting up the plant to those who were ineligible.

Following a complaint from 163 displaced people, who were assured jobs as part of the rehabilita­tion policy of the government, the NCST has summoned the chief secretary of Odisha, the secretary of the ministry of steel and the senior management of the RSP. A review meeting, to be chaired by the new chairperso­n Nand Kumar Sai, will be held here on May 16.

The issue has been simmering in the state, which goes to polls in 2019. It is likely to be drummed up by the BJP, which is hopeful of expanding its footprint in the coastal state. The party recently won 297 zila parishad seats, up from 36 in 2012.

In 2016, it came to the NCST’s notice (based on complaints) that the RSP had provided incorrect informatio­n about giving jobs to those whose lands had been acquired; and given employment to individual­s who did not meet the hiring conditions.

According to sources in the tribal affairs ministry, under which NCST is a statutory body, the former chairman Rameshwar Oraon, held a hearing in November 2016, and in a scathing observatio­n said either the RSP had not been honest in giving details or there were irregulari­ties in employment.

“Authoritie­s at RSP informed the Odisha government that employment had been offered to 6,000 displaced people. But when the list was checked, only 3,000 were found to have been employed. Among them, many had with no link to the displaced families,” a source said.

It came to the NCST’s notice that the company also failed to verify the land records of about 2,211 individual­s who had claimed the jobs, claiming displaceme­nt.

In 1995, while hearing the case, the Supreme Court had identified a list of 1,098 families who had to be rehabilita­ted; it was mentioned that the number of people on the list would not be increased.

“RSP mentioned that from the 1,098 families, 700 were given jobs, process for 99 was nearing completion, 129 cases were ongoing and 165 were pending for non availabili­ty of candidates. RSP also felt that an additional 165 claiming to be displaced is above the 1098 cap and the list would continue,” the source said.

The argument was dismissed by Oraon, who said the SC order had not stopped the steel ministry or the state government from drawing up a policy for displaced families. He had contended that the new Relief and Rehabilita­tion Act came into existence in 2013, while land acquisitio­n was carried out by RSP in the 1960s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India