AMRIT MATHUR

That Virat Kohli’s team is at the top when the BCCI is at its lowest validates Geet Sethi’s theory that success is more difficult to explain than failure.

The Indian team has also junked the view that sporting excellence and good governance are related.

At present, governance at the BCCI is critically weak.The BCCI is not in control of itself let alone cricket. Under attack from fans/ media/courts, its position is that of a boxer lurching in the ring waiting for the referee’s whistle to end the bout.

Engaged in a ‘life or death’ battle, Indian cricket has taken a step back. The domestic structure-the foundation on which rests all else---needs reform. On wickets and umpiring, factors key to raise quality,there is no clarity.

Ranji Trophy remains an unloved child, neglected and directionless. Fortunately, last season’s ‘neutral venues only’ arrangement has been abandoned but player welfare issues remain unaddressed. The misery of first-class players is like that of poor farmers who face acute financial insecurity and don’t know when/ whether /how much they will be paid.This despite the recession-proof nature of India’s cricket economy as confirmed by rising values for its commercial properties.The paradox is puzzling: money is not in short supply but Ranji players exist on the edge, close to the poverty line.

Contrast the crumbling governance structure with the spectacular success of Team India. Last season, Kohli and Kumble knocked over everyone and the victory march continues except for the the glitch at the Oval.With

Jadeja batting at 9, five openers