Hindustan Times ST (Jaipur)

An attack and two divided communitie­s

TIMELINE

- Mukesh Mathrani htraj@hindustant­imes.com

SATA CASE Virmaram died after he was attacked in September. The death led to unrest between Jats and Charans

It was on April 2, 2016 that Virmaram, a resident of Sata village in Barmer district was allegedly attacked by four people. A badly injured Virmaram was taken to hospital and an FIR was registered against four named accused the next day.

Virmaram died on September 24 this year, 18 months after the attack. His death would have been written off as just another statistic in the annual crime record of the state, but for the fact that the attack on him had a political angle and that it was allegedly mastermind­ed by a member of Charan community. Virmaram belonged to Jat community.

Now, politics, first over the attack on him, and now on his death has led to polarizati­on of the two communitie­s —Jats and Charans. The communitie­s, led by political leaders, have already exhibited their show strength taking to roads over what has now come to be known as the “Sata episode”. Both have issued warnings about intense protests if their demands were not met.

Spread just over 971 hectares, Sata is a village located along the Indo-Pak border under Chohtan block of Barmer district. Home to around 2,200 people, the village is also a gram panchayat, an election to the same allegedly being the root cause behind the murder.

Leela Kanwar, wife of Tejdan Charan, a resident of Sata village, won the sarpanch election defeating her nearest rival Tuggi Devi, wife of Bankaram Jat, a resident of neighbouri­ng Rangwali village. Later, Bankaram lodged a complaint against Leela Kanwar alleging that she had contested the election by submitting fake documents. The complaint turned into a prestige issue, creating a rift among the Charans and the Jats in the area.

When that attack took place on April 2, 2016, Bankaram was allegedly the prime target. He was accompanie­d by Virmaram and Prabhuram. While the other two sustained minor injuries, Virmaram bore the brunt of the attack and was rushed to the hospital with a critical head injury. It was alleged that the attack was planned by Tejdan Charan. A case was filed a day later naming four accused — Maheshdan, Jasdan, Karnidan and Goridan — at Bakhasar police station under Sections 147, 148, 341, 323, 307 and 149 of IPC. The FIR didn’t mention the name of Tejdan Charan. Jat community has been alleging that it was under political pressure that police did not lodge any case against Tejdan.

Even as politickin­g began over the attack and the FIR, the probe changed hands at least five times —beginning with the Bakhasar police station to being handed to the Crime Investigat­ion Department-Crime Branch (CB-CID, which is probing the case now.

Meanwhile, Virmaram died on September 24.

Following his death, Jat community intensifie­d the protest, demanding that Tejdan Charan be booked under Section 302 and arrested. On October 5, they organised a protest led by BJP MP Col Sonaram Choudhary at district headquarte­rs. Stating that community had strength in numbers, Choudhary warned that if immediate action was not taken against the accused, “they won’t think twice before going violent”. The community once again organised protests at various blocks in Barmer on October 16.

A week later, on October 23, Jats organised another protest at Barmer city. Apart Sonaram Choudhary, former MP and Congress national secretary Harish Choudhary also joined the protest. They handed over a memorandum to the district collector in the name of chief minister stating that if no action was taken against the accused by November 15, “the community will be forced to adopt violet measures”.

Following the Jat protests, the

BARMER:

Charan community too showcased their strength with a massive demonstrat­ion at district headquarte­rs on October 30. Prominent leaders of Rajput community extended their support. Apart from this, leaders of Rajpurohit, Prajapat, minority and many others also joined hands with Charans. A huge number of Charan community members from Gujarat too reached Barmer to lend muscle to the agitation.

Among others, former MLA and national president of Akhil Bhartiya Charan (Gadhvi) Mahasabha C D Deval, national president of Rajput Karni Sena Sukhdev Singh Gogamedi, Rajpurohit community leader Ram Singh Bothiya, minority leader Maulwi Abdul Kareem, Prajapat community leader Balram Prajapat and prominent Rajput leaders Hari Singh Sodha, Rajendra Singh Bhiyand, Roop Singh Rathore, Ratan Singh Bhakhasar attended and addressed the gathering of the Charan community. BJP leader and Sheo MLA Manvendra Singh could not attend the demonstrat­ion but extended his support to the Charans.

The Charan community has warned the government against “any action against innocent people under any political pressure”. They also warned that “undue favor to any community” will force them to adopt violence.

Khetaram Choudhary, a Jat leader, who led the community protest, says, “We are not protesting against any community or creating pressure (on government). We are demanding justice for the man who was killed. He was the only earning member in his family and his death has created starvation-like situation for the family. His only son, who was studying in Class 8, had been forced to quit school.”

Rajendra Singh Bhiyand, a social activist who joined hands with the Charan community, says that some political leaders were instigatin­g both the parties. “We favour fair investigat­ion and demand that no innocent should be victimized,” he added.

Incidental­ly, local BJP MP Col (retd) Sonaram Choudhary has warned of “dire consequenc­es” if justice is denied and action not taken against culprits.

Hitting out at Rajput Karni Sena, Choudhary alleged that Gogamedi, the outfit’s chief, was indulging in caste politics. He also warns that “if such people were not stopped,” he would be forced to “form a Kisaan Sena or a Teja Sena ”.

The face-off between the two communitie­s has complicate­d the situation for political parties, especially as assembly polls are scheduled in the state late next year. Jats constitute around 20% of the vote bank in Barmer-Jaisalmer region. On the other hand, Rajputs, Charans, Rajpurohit­s, Prajapats and Rana Rajputs together make up for another 25% of the total voter base. Ignoring any one group can cost the political parties dear.

The issue found resonance in Assembly too. Last month, replying to a question related to the killing of Virmaram, state home minister Gulab Chand Kataria confirmed that case was being probed by CID-CB and that two accused have been arrested.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ?? HT FILE PHOTOS ?? (Clockwise from top) The recent protest by the Jat community over Virmaram’s death; The Charan and other communitie­s also held protests in Barmer as a show of strength. The victim, Virmaram.
HT FILE PHOTOS (Clockwise from top) The recent protest by the Jat community over Virmaram’s death; The Charan and other communitie­s also held protests in Barmer as a show of strength. The victim, Virmaram.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India