Hindustan Times ST (Jaipur)

No evidence of any cheating: Court

- Ashok Bagriya letters@hindustant­imes.com

I am glad that the court has pronounced unambiguou­sly that all this massive propaganda which was being done against the UPA was without any foundation One thing is clear... the allegation of a major scam involving the highest levels of government was never true and not correct and that has been establishe­d today The Congress is treating 2G verdict as a badge of honour, but its zero loss theory was proven wrong when the Supreme Court quashed spectrum allocation in February 2012 9 YEARS ON Pick by pick, the special court stamped ‘not guilty’ on everyone accused as per the charges levelled by the CBI in the most highprofil­e case of corruption from the UPA era. It summed up the case as thus: misreading, selective reading, nonreading, out of context reading NEWDELHI:Former

telecom minister A Raja, DMK leader and Rajya Sabha MP Kanimozhi and 33 other accused including companies were given a clean chit by the 2G special court in New Delhi on Thursday, when it ruled that ‘case of high political corruption’ was not made out against any one charged by the CBI and ED.

Touted to have caused a loss of ~1.76 lakh crore to the public exchequer, the court ruled ‘no evidence of cheating’ or ‘criminal breach of trust’ was made out against any of the accused.

Assailing the CBI charges, the court said: “The charge sheet is based mainly on misreading, selective reading, non-reading and out of context reading of the official record. Further, it is based on some oral statements made by the witnesses during investigat­ion, which they have not owned up in the witness box. Lastly, if statements were made orally, the same were contrary to the official record and thus, not acceptable in law.”

The court also said, “examinatio­n of the action or inaction of officials belonging to various department­s, that is, DoT, law ministry, finance ministry and the PMO, shows that the controvers­y about the issue of LOIs on 10.01.2008 and subsequent grant of licences and allocation of spectrum arose due to unnecessar­y questions and objections raised by some officials and unwarrante­d suggestion­s put forward by others. None of these suggestion­s were carried to logical conclusion and were left unaddresse­d. These were used by others to create controvers­y. “

The court criticised the delay in recording of witness statements. “It is clear that three most important functionar­ies of the DoT were examined by the CBI at a highly belated stage. “This unwarrante­d delay coupled with the type of hype around the case indicates the witnesses may be under pressure or even coerced to toe the prosecutio­n line.”

Acquitting the 35 individual­s and companies in the case, the court said there was not one credible witness. “No witness from DoT deposed that any deception was practised upon him by any of the accused. There is absolutely no evidence to the effect that any false representa­tion was made. Hence, there is no merit in the submission that by altering this A Raja (garlanded) with DMK supporters and Kanimozhi (right) with her husband after their acquittal in the 2G case. Arvind Yadav/HT POLITICIAN­S CORPORATES

Former Union telecom minister

Former telecom secretary COMPANIES

M/s Reliance Telecom Ltd.

M/s Loop Mobile (India) Ltd

M/s Loop Telecom

Indian engineerin­g service (IES) officer, personal secretary, telecom minister Ltd (formerly BPL Mobile Communicat­ions) M/s Essar Teleholdin­gs Ltd note, Raja and Behura cheated DoT officials into believing that the altered policy had the concurrenc­e of learned SG. Accordingl­y, there is absolutely no evidence of cheating on record.”

Criticisin­g the role of Telecom ministry officials, the court asserted, “Notes recorded by various officers are in highly illegible handwritin­g. Furthermor­e, the notes are either cryptic, even telegraphi­c, or extremely lengthy, recorded in highly technical and layered language, which cannot easily be understood by others, but can convenient­ly be used for finding fault with the superior authoritie­s for agreeing to or disagreein­g from it, as the case may be. Notes have also been recorded on extreme margins of the note sheet, some of which have become frayed with the passage of time and cannot be read and understood properly. Nonunderst­anding of the official notes by outside agency creates an impression of wrongdoing. P CHIDAMBARA­M, senior Congress leader Former DMK MP and director/ promoter, Kalaignar TV Pvt Ltd M/s Unitech Wireless (Tamil Nadu) Pvt Ltd M/s Swan Telecom Pvt Ltd Managing director, Swan Telecom Pvt Ltd, now Etisalat

DB Telecom Pvt Ltd

Director, Swan Telecom, and managing director, DB Realty

Manging director, Unitech Ltd

Managing director, Reliance ADA group

President, Reliance ADA group

Vice president, Reliance ADA group

Director, Kusegaon Fruits and Vegetables Pvt Ltd

Director, Kusegaon Fruits and Vegetables Pvt Ltd

Director, Cineyug Media & Entertainm­ent Pvt Ltd

Director/promoter, Kalaignar TV Pvt Ltd

Vice-chairman, Essar group

Promoter, Essar group Promoter, Khaitan group

Former director, Santa Trading Pvt Ltd

Director, strategy, Essar group CHARGES/ALLEGATION­S

A Raja conspired to give benefits to M/s Swan Telecom (company of Shahid Balwa and Vinod Goenka) and to Sanjay Chandra’s Unitech, in the issuance of LOIs, UAS Licences and Spectrum by DoT

A cut-off date on receipt and processing of UASL applicatio­ns, so the system can be manipulate­d to benefit a favoured few

The ‘first come first serve’ policy was changed to ‘first compliance first serve’ without disclosing to the public but only to a favoured few, who, with all the documents ready, took advantage by getting LOIs, UASL and Spectrum

Swan Telecom was the front company of Reliance Communicat­ions, which already had UASL. But to conceal the violation of Clause 8 of UASL guidelines, a mechanism was devised to conceali the true ownership of the former company The dual technology policy was manipulate­d, thereby defeating the right of Tata Teleservic­es and Tata Teleservic­es (Maharashtr­a) Government of India was cheated by non-revision of entry fee Dynamix Realty, a partnershi­p firm of DB Realty, and other DB group firms, paid ~200 crore to Kalaignar TV during December 2008 and August 2009, following a circuitous route through Kusegaon Fruits and Vegetables (a DB group firm) and Cineyug Films Pvt Ltd

 ?? PTI ?? DMK working president MK Stalin is offered sweets by party workers as they celebrate the special court’s acquittal verdict in 2G case in Chennai on Thursday.
PTI DMK working president MK Stalin is offered sweets by party workers as they celebrate the special court’s acquittal verdict in 2G case in Chennai on Thursday.
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India