US nuke arms policy targets Russia
TOUGH STANCE Russia would face unacceptably dire costs if it attacks
Trump administration announced it will continue much of the Obama administration’s nuclear weapons policy, but take a more aggressive stance toward Russia.
It said on Friday Russia must be convinced it would face “unacceptably dire costs” if it were to threaten even a limited nuclear attack in Europe.
The sweeping review of US nuclear policy does not call for any net increase in strategic nuclear weapons — a position that stands in contrast to President Donald Trump’s statement, in a tweet shortly before he took office, that the US “must greatly strengthen and expand its nuclear capability until such time as the world comes to its senses regarding nukes.”
In his State of the Union address Tuesday, he made no mention of expansion, though he said the arsenal must deter acts of aggression. A 74-page report summarising the review’s findings calls North Korea a “clear and grave threat” to the U.S. and its allies.
It asserts that any North Korean nuclear attack against the US or its allies will result in “the end of that regime.” It also cast China as a potential nuclear adversary, saying the US arsenal is tailored to “prevent Beijing from mistakenly concluding” that it could gain advantage by using its nuclear weapons in Asia, or that “any use of nuclear weapons, however limited, is acceptable.”
The Pentagon-led review of the US nuclear arsenal and the policies
WASHINGTON:The
that govern it was ordered by Trump a year ago. In a written statement, Trump said US strategy is designed to make use of nuclear weapons less likely. In an apparent reference to the threat of catastrophic cyberattack, he said the US aims to strengthen deterrence of major attacks against the US and its allies, including those that “may not come in the form of nuclear weapons.” Known officially as a nuclear posture review, the report drew blistering criticism from arms control groups. “President Trump is embarking on a reckless path,” said Lisbeth Gronlund, a senior scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists.