SC raps HC for bail to techie’s murder accused
NEWDELHI: A court conscious of the plural composition of the country while called upon to deal with rights of various communities, cannot make such observations which may appear to be coloured with a bias for or against a community
The Supreme Court of India has criticised a Bombay High Court order that seemed to suggest, while granting bail to three accused in a murder case, that they had been provoked “in the name of religion”.
On 8 February, the Supreme Court set aside the Bombay High Court order that released on bail the three accused in the murder of Pune-based techie Mohsin Shaikh in 2014.
The three accused are part of right-wing organisation Hindu Rashtra Sena and had reportedly attended an inflammatory meeting just before they accosted and killed Shaikh. The meeting happened in the background of communal clashes in Pune.
While the Supreme Court’s decision to quash the Bombay High Court order was reported on 8 February itself, it is only now that the apex court’s order has been uploaded on its site -- and it shows the top court’s displeasure.
Taking exception to the high court order, the Supreme Court bench of Justice SA Bobde and Justice L Nageswar Rao said that the high court judge should have refrained from recording reasons that appears to justify the murder of the victim in the name of religion.
The Supreme Court bench said, “We have no doubt that a Court fully conscious of the plural composition of the Country while called upon to deal with rights of various communities, cannot make such observations which may appear to be coloured with a bias for or against a community.”
The Supreme Court records in its order that it is at pains to understand “why it (high court) said that “the fault of the deceased were only that he belonged to another religion” and further why the judge said “I consider this factor in favour of the applicants/accused.”
“We find that the aforesaid reason can, on a fair reading, be understood or misunderstood almost as a mitigating circumstance or a kind of a justification for the murder and it is obvious