End of Sarkar’s sarkar in Tripura
POLL PLANK Though Manik Sarkar’s regime brought peace, BJP presented itself as an alternative which would bring vikas NEW DELHI:
At the end of an hourlong interview in early January, when asked if the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) could challenge and replace the Communist Party of India (Marxist) in Tripura, the state’s longest serving chief minister, Manik Sarkar laughed. “Challenge? Replace? You go and ask the people. And you will know the answer.”
On Saturday, the people of Tripura answered — bringing to an end 25 years of uninterrupted CPM rule in the state and the 20 year old reign of Sarkar.
The defeat could not have come at a worse time for the party, already at a low after losing West Bengal twice and struggling for survival as its foremost ideological rival, BJP, expands its control over both power and narrative. All its hopes were invested in Sarkar, and on Saturday, it got dashed.
Sarkar would go down as a remarkable figure in the history of the Indian left. He placed a premium on national security and understood the importance of law and order for ordinary citizens. He understood the importance of the ‘identity’ question — and not just the class question — and stitched together a wide alliance. And he knew that culture mattered as much as economics.
Tripura was torn between Bengalis and tribals when he took over in 1998. Insurgents, often operating from Bangladesh, stormed the state with violence. Sarkar — through aggressive cross-border operations — weakened them, and used the resulting space to fill in the political vacuum. While his Bengali identity helped in consolidating control over the majority, he ensured that the CPM was active in tribal areas too — often sweeping the 20 tribal of 60 seats. And he focused on social development indicators.
But dissatisfaction was rampant in the state too. Even in 2013, the Congress got a little over 36% of the vote — showing the presence of a vibrant anti-CPM constituency. It needed a more energetic opposition — and that is what the BJP provided.
Sarkar’s success — of bringing peace — had created a generation with little memory of conflict, and with aspirations for more.
Government employees, many CPM cadres, were unhappy, still on fourth pay commission salaries. BJP promised them a hike, committing to implement the Seventh Pay Commission. Young students were unhappy, either because they felt Tripura was missing out on modernity and jobs or because they felt CPM cadres were getting all the jobs that were available. BJP presented itself as an alternative which would bring vikas.
Sarkar’s biggest asset was his clean image and projection of austerity. BJP attacked his government’s record and capitalised on a chit fund scam to tarnish his credentials on the count. And Sarkar’s Bengali-tribal alliance lay in tatters, as the BJP succeeded in projecting him as a Bengali chauvinist, who had deprived tribals of their share in power. In Agartala’s colleges and bazaars, on the outskirts of the capital, in the Bengali towns and tribal villages, there was a common refrain in the election. Sarkar is a good man, but it is time for change.
After 20 years, Tripura has bid farewell to a leader who mattered at a crucial time in the state’s history. But for Sarkar, it has been a most cruel good-bye, for the state has shifted to his most bitter ideological rival.