Hindustan Times ST (Jaipur)

When House faced its worst disruption

- Saubhadra Chatterji letters@hindustant­imes.com (Looking Back will take a contempora­ry news developmen­t and bring to readers a related slice of history)

The second half of the budget session looks headed for a complete washout as protests by many non-NDA parties have not let a single day of peaceful proceeding­s. HT looks back at the winter session of 2010 when Parliament was held hostage to protests and recorded its worst performanc­e in close to two decades.

NEWDELHI:

The protests of the BJP and many other parties rocked both Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha after the CAG report on 2G scam became public. The Lower House and the Upper House could utilise only 6% and 2% of their allotted time. The report spoke about a possible loss of ₹1.76 lakh crore in the sale of 2G spectrum. The Opposition demanded that the government must constitute a Joint Parliament­ary Committee (JPC) to probe the scam—a demand the Manmohan Singh government rejected firmly. This stand, however, just lasted for two months, as in the 2011 budget session, the government agreed to form a JPC to avoid washout of another session. The Supreme Court cancelled the allotted spectrum and licenses allocated and the CBI framed cases against leaders like former telecom minister A Raja and his party colleague Kanimozhi.

WHAT HAPPENED

The Congress-led UPA government, which had retained power with a bigger tally a year ago, faced firing from the BJP—led NDA, SP, TDP, the Left parties, BJD and AIADMK over the demand to form a JPC into the 2G spectrum scam.

The trouble started when the controvers­ial CAG report was tabled in Parliament on November 16. The then Prime Minister, Manmohan Singh, removed telecom minister A Raja but it failed to appease the Opposition.

The UPA 2 government argued that the Public Accounts Committee should review the report—as it happens with most of the CAG reports.

Rajya Sabha chairman Hamid Ansari remarked at the end of the session, “No debates on issues of public interest took place. No special mentions, no zero hour interventi­ons took place, no questions were answered orally and no supplement­ary questions were raised.”

And just like the current session when amid continuous disruption­s, the government managed to pass the financial bills for the budget, in the winter session of 2010 the Centre got approval for supplement­ary demands for ₹46,000 crore. The 2010 session and the current session have proved that whenever allegation­s of corruption come up in the public domain, the Parliament witnesses a major uproar and disruption­s.

The 2010 session became the worst performing session in recent times. Earlier, the Parliament could not function for 17 days in 2001 and 45 days in 1987 over the Tehelka and Bofors scam, respective­ly.

This year, the first half of the budget session went smoothly but after the news of the alleged Punjab National Bank (PNB) fraud by jeweller Nirav Modi and Mehuls Choski hit the headlines, things took a different turn.

The Joint Parliament­ary Committee, which was led by a Congress member, eventually gave a clean chit to the then Prime Minister and mentioned that he was misled by A Raja.

 ?? SONU MEHTA/HT FILE ?? Samajwadi Party (SP) leaders take out a protest against the then UPA government during the Parliament’s winter session in 2010.
SONU MEHTA/HT FILE Samajwadi Party (SP) leaders take out a protest against the then UPA government during the Parliament’s winter session in 2010.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India