Hindustan Times ST (Jaipur)

It makes eminent sense to gather at the high table

Both the Centre and separatist­s in Kashmir have not laid down any preconditi­ons for a dialogue

- HARINDER BAWEJA Rajdeep Sardesai is a senior journalist and author The views expressed are personal harinder.baweja@hindustant­imes.com Inner Voice comprises contributi­ons from our readers. The views expressed are personal Innervoice@hindustant­imes.com

When hardliner separatist Syed Ali Shah Geelani made it a point to celebrate a fellow Hurriyat Conference leader Shabir Shah’s daughter, for topping the CBSE Class XII exam in Jammu and Kashmir, many noticed his choice of words. Lauding the efforts of Sama Shabir, he said she was ‘a role model for the young generation’.

Geelani, known for his hawkish, pro-Pakistan stance, had used the same words, not too long ago. Referring to slain militant commander Burhan Wani, Geelani hailed him as a ‘role model for the young generation’. That Wani, had in fact, emerged as a role model for thousands of young people in Kashmir, was evident soon after the news of his death spread on July 8, 2016.

Geelani’s statement on Sama Shabir is not the only one which indicates a slight shift in the position of the separatist­s. In another statement, issued by the Joint Resistance Leadership (JRL), comprising Geelani, Mirwaiz Umar Farooq and Yasin Malik, the three said that they were ready to be part of a dialogue after the Government of India clarified what it wants to talk about and speaks in one language, as they cannot afford to be part of an ambiguous effort.

Both the separatist­s and the Narendra Modi-led government have signalled a shift and it makes eminent sense for both sides to sit across the table. It is important to note, straightaw­ay, that neither side has articulate­d any pre-conditions. Home minister Rajnath Singh, while making an offer for talks, has refrained from saying the dialogue would be ‘within the Indian Constituti­on’. Similarly, the separatist­s, while agreeing to set the negotiatio­n process in motion, have not asked — as they have many times in the past — that the government first accept Kashmir as an internatio­nal dispute and withdraw all troops from the state. process.

Failure and success are just like two faces of the same coin. It is obvious we can’t fail every time like we can’t always succeed. But whom does the success belong to? You! And, your failure? Again, you! But we aren’t ready to accept that, right? We fail to realise that either it’s our fear that didn’t let us try something, or stopped us from correcting ourselves. So, you create fear for yourself. Situations can only stop you for a while to rethink that you need to change your approach.

It is clear that the ground is being prepared for a dialogue, likely to be headed by the government’s interlocut­or, Dineshwar Sharma, though Geelani has ruled out talks with the former intelligen­ce bureau chief. So what induced the change in thinking? Soon after Modi took over the reins of office in May 2014, he first surprised everyone by calling Pakistani Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif for his swearing-in ceremony. Within three months, however, the government called off foreign secretary-level talks because the Pakistani high commission­er met with leaders of the Hurriyat Conference. The foreign secretary called the Pakistani high commission­er a few hours before he was scheduled to meet Shabir Shah, saying the talks would be called off if he went ahead with his meeting.

If the government is now holding out an olive branch to the same set of separatist­s it saw as ‘anti-nationals’, it is due to the compelling ground realities in the Valley, where Wani continues to hold sway as a ‘role model’ for an increasing number of youth, willing to choose the path of violence.

Wani’s death has clearly marked a watershed moment in Kashmir and can be linked directly to the steady and increased numbers of locals willing to embrace ‘martyrdom’. Sustained operations against militants have not served as a deterrent, but have added to their numbers. According to the state police, 121 militants have been killed and 216 local youth have joined militancy since Wani’s killing in 2016.

In the past six months, New Delhi has made several overtures. It first appointed Sharma as the interlocut­or, who then crafted the amnesty scheme for first-time stone-pelters that benefitted over 4,000. It also announced a conditiona­l ceasefire for the holy month of Ramzan and by offering talks, has acknowledg­ed the separatist­s as stakeholde­rs in the peace process.

In Kashmir, where the ground realities are complex, the Hurriyat might still take time to walk the talk. If it has nuanced its response — by seeking clarificat­ions and not rejecting the offer out right — it is because it knows that the dialogue is an opportunit­y to resurrect itself politicall­y. The Hurriyat leadership lost control of the Kashmir street after Wani’s death. The stone-pelters, who often bring the Valley to a standstill, are a potent, leaderless force which has even mocked the Hurriyat and questioned its legitimacy. The separatist­s do not resonate with today’s young generation like they did in the early nineties when the insurgency first took root.

A seat at the high table is the perfect opportunit­y to change that, provided the Hurriyat has the wisdom to seize it.

IF THE GOVERNMENT IS NOW HOLDING OUT AN OLIVE BRANCH TO THE SAME SET OF SEPARATIST­S IT SAW AS ‘ANTINATION­ALS’, IT IS DUE TO THE COMPELLING GROUND REALITIES IN THE VALLEY

Sounds simple, but practicall­y we all fail now and then because there is someone who continuous­ly stops us from being the best version of ourselves. And that’s again you! So, challenge yourself enough every day, break your own records, and stop limiting yourself. Each day you will see a new person in the mirror smiling back and saying thank you for showing him or her the same world with a new vision.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India