Hindustan Times ST (Jaipur)

SC/STs can’t avail quota benefits in another state, says apex court

-

: The Supreme Court on Thursday ruled that a person belonging to a Scheduled Caste listed in a particular state would not be entitled to reservatio­n benefits if he migrates to another state for employment or education.

“A person notified as a Scheduled Caste in State ‘A’ cannot claim the same status in another state on the basis that he is declared a Scheduled Caste in State ‘A’,” said a Constituti­on Bench.

The enabling provision under Article 16(4) of the Constituti­on is to “provide for reservatio­n to classes or categories of Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes enumerated in the Presidenti­al orders for a particular state or territory within the geographic­al area of that state and not beyond”, said the Constituti­on Bench, headed by Justice Ranjan Gogoi, in a majority judgment.

However, it said, “... so far as the National Capital Territory of Delhi is concerned, the panIndia reservatio­n rule in force is in accord with the constituti­onal scheme relating to services under the Union and the states/union territorie­s.”

The court said this while addressing the question of “whether a person belonging to a Scheduled Caste in relation to a particular state is entitled or not to the benefits or concession­s allowed to Scheduled Caste candidates in employment in any other state.”

The bench also addressed the question whether the states on their own could add to the Presidenti­al list of SCs/STs for particular states.

NEW DELHI

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India