Hindustan Times ST (Jaipur)

IN THE FLOW

Though Aatish Taseer’s book appears to be about the Brahmins of Benaras, it is also about the continuing aftershock­s of colonialis­m, about India and Bharat, and the persistenc­e of caste

- Manjula Narayan manjula.narayan@htlive.com Lamat R Hasan letters@htlive.com

Awoman has come to end her days at the House of Death in Benaras. “The woman’s son, a sixty-fiveyear-old science teacher from Bihar, sat by her side, reading to her from Tulsidas’s poem. The old woman’s hearing was gone, and the reading, like the small sips of water from the Ganges that were poured down her open lips, was a ritual act. It had been this woman’s long standing wish to die in Benares; her son had made good on this wish. He had brought her here to die and be free,” Aatish Taseer writes in one of the most affecting scenes in The Twice-Born; Life and Death on the Ganges. The passage took you back to your 12-year-old self. On a school trip, you had filled a bottle with water from this holiest of Indian rivers. Two decades later, as Ammachen, grandfathe­r, took his last breath in faraway Kerala, they wet his parched tongue with the Gangajal. It felt like the closing of a circuit, like it had been preordaine­d, and your adult self, until then always partial to Reason, began to Believe. Not in banal ritual and temple theatrics but in the truth of your own Insignific­ance.

Though Taseer’s book is ostensibly about the Brahmins of Benaras, it is actually a look at the psychologi­cal devastatio­n wreaked on the colonized self, about the dissatisfa­ctions of being a Macaulaypu­tra, about the violent death of his father Salman Taseer, the governor of Punjab in Pakistan, about his own search for authentici­ty through the study of Sanskrit, about Hinduism and Hindutva, about the fascist nostalgia that drives the latter, about India and Bharat, about this nation’s rejection of beauty in its rush to develop, and about the endurance of caste in contempora­ry India.

That’s a lot to pack into 242 pages but the author succeeds. He draws the reader to look at the world through the eyes of a series of unsympathe­tic but unswerving characters, some of whom manage to be admirable despite the rank casteism manifested in their observance of pollution laws. Like PK Mukhopadhy­ay, the former head of philosophy at Jadhavpur University, who denies two young people his sanction of their inter caste relationsh­ip:

“Mukhopadya­y would have the couple announce before all that they were in love, but that as their “system would not allow for its consecrati­on, they had decided to forsake their romantic happiness and respectful­ly part… Surely it was more honorable to sacrifice one’s selfish happiness for the endurance of the system one’s ancestors had devised.”

You are appalled on behalf of the couple even as she understand­s (with repugnance) Mukhopadhy­ay’s distaste at the transgress­ion. Taseer’s talent lies in his ability to bestow on the reader this temporary gift of double vision even as his own sense of outrage is never in doubt.

It is evident in the section on Anand’s yearning for the girl with the shorn hair in the monastery for the caste and sexual purity she embodies. It shows up too in the chapter entitled The Dharma of Place. In Shivam’s house in his native village, the tension builds up as the author and his lower caste driver near the end of their meal. The Brahmins can’t (won’t) wash Mukesh’s plate. What about the author’s plate? In an acute earlier paragraph that unveils the amorphous nature of caste Taseer muses that he seems to be excepted from the laws of pollution:

“Shivam’s village, save for the odd family of the warrior caste, was exclusivel­y Brahmin. I knew this without quite knowing what it implied. What, for instance, did my presence in the Brahmin household denote? My father was Muslim, and since religion in India is patrilinea­l, my staying overnight in the house should have been an unspeakabl­e defilement, but strangely, it wasn’t. I seemed, perhaps on account of my being English speaking, to be exempt from the rules of caste. Shivam did, however, make one small adjustment as the village approached: he stopped calling me by my conspicuou­sly Persian name and rechristen­ed me with a reliably Hindu alternativ­e: Nitish. “

The scene with its undertow of ghastly comedy recalls, as do many incidents featuring caste/religious ‘code-mixing’ in contempora­ry India (Rehana FathimaSur­ya Gayathri at Sabarimala comes to mind), incidents from Rahi Masoom

Raza’s irregular gem Scene 75 (translated by Poonam Saxena; published by HarperColl­ins) where an Amjad Ali passes himself off as Gaurishank­ar Lal Krantikari, a Ramnath is actually Peter (or vice versa, you forget which) and Ghaffar Kanpuri is also Ram Manohar Kanpuri!

The wide intellectu­al sweep of The Twice Born includes everyone from Koestler, Alice Boner, Nehru, Gandhi, and AK Coomaraswa­my to Bhasa, Bhartrhari, and Kalidasa via KA Abbas. The writing has a lyrical quality that makes you want to wander the streets of Varanasi once more, even will yourself to gaze at the fearsome Manikarnik­a Ghat, that mountainou­s perenniall­y-burning pyre.

If you have any complaints at all about The Twice Born, which often feels like homage to VS Naipaul, like a book that could have flowed from the late writer’s India: A Million Mutinies Now (1990), they are about Taseer’s tendency to include too many descriptio­ns of teeth and to use words like umbrageous (trees) and nacreous (eyes). But this is a minor quibble.

The Twice-Born makes the reader think about religion, caste, culture, India and the idea of modernity, and most rewardingl­y, about where she stands in relation to all these.

OF COLD CASES AND PERSONAL GHOSTS

Ankush Saikia’s More Bodies Will Fall sat on my desk untouched for a long time. I would stare at the ugly cover and remember Jhumpa Lahiri’s remark in The Clothing of Books that book jackets make or break a book. However, when I did pick up Saikia, I couldn’t put it down. More Bodies Will Fall is the third in the Arjun Arora mysteries, and journalist-turned-writer Saikia shines as a master writer in this genre. Saikia, an insider in the northeast, simplifies a political plot, and the subtext is a subtle social commentary on the Us vs Them divide; the divide between the “Indians” and those from the north east, exposing every crass stereotype that both sides hold.

A Naga girl is killed in Delhi. There’s been no headway in the case even after a year. Her influentia­l father decides to hire a private detective. Arjun Arora takes up the case, albeit reluctantl­y, as the investigat­ions are likely to lead him to the north east, where his past lies buried. Arora is a middle-aged detective who has quit the army, his marriage has ended, and he is struggling to make a mark with his puny detective agency. Arora is flawed and it is

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India