Neesham mocks ICC’S rule change for Super Over
TOO LATE New Zealanders react after the world body decided to change the controversial boundary count rule
NEW DELHI: New Zealand allrounder Jimmy Neesham on Tuesday mocked the International Cricket Council (ICC) after the world body decided to scrap the controversial boundary count rule that saw his team lose the 50-over World Cup to England.
The ICC on Monday tweaked the super over rule for all its major events following the uproar over the outcome of the men’s World Cup final in July when England were declared winners against New Zealand on boundary count.
The two teams had headed into the super over after scores in the final were tied.
Once the super over also ended in a draw, England were crowned champions on account of a superior boundary count.
“Next on the agenda: Better binoculars for the ice spotters on the Titanic,” tweeted Neesham along with a link about the news of the change in the ICC rule regarding super over.
HEARTBROKEN
The Kane Willamson-led side was left heartbroken after ICC decided to hand over the World Cup trophy to England on the basis of better boundary count after the finals and the ensuing Super Over finished in a tie.
Neesham was one of the New Zealand batsman who featured in that super over.
Former New Zealand batting coach Craig Mcmillan, whose final match with the Black Caps was the Lord’s decider, was also unimpressed.
“Bit late ICC,” he tweeted. Mcmillan also brought up the issue of the controversial overthrow which saw England being awarded six runs in the final over.
It was a Martin Guptill throw which got deflected and raced
DAVID WHITE, NZC chief executive
It’s good that future World Cup tiebreakers will be decided on the field. We can’t change the past; what has happened has happened.
towards the boundary as Stokes dived to make it to the crease.
“How about fixing the other rule issue ICC...... a dead ball once the ball has hit/deflected from a batsman?” Mcmillian wrote.
New Zealand Cricket (NZC) chief executive David White said he was pleased to see ICC come up with a better solution following the controversial World Cup final.
GOOD FOR THE FUTURE “It is good that future World Cup tie-breakers will be decided on the field. We cannot change the past; what has happened has happened but we are pleased to see the International Cricket Council employing a better solution,” White was quoted as saying by “stuff.co.nz”.
The International Cricket Council announced that now in case a situation arises where both teams are tied even after the super over in a final or semi-final, t he s uper over will be repeated until there is a clear winner.
“In group stages, if the Super Over is tied the match will be tied.
“In Semi-finals and Finals, there is one change to the Super Over regulation in keeping with the basic principle of scoring more runs than the opponent to win, the Super Over will be repeated until one team has more runs than the other,” the ICC said after their board meeting on Monday.