Hindustan Times ST (Jaipur)

How Indrani came forward to testify against Chidambara­ms

INX MEDIA CASE Indrani’s testimony is a crucial piece of evidence against P Chidambara­m

- Neeraj Chauhan neeraj.chauhan@hindustant­imes.com

NEW DELHI: INX Media’s jailed co-founder Indrani Mukerjea, the prime witness in the case against Congress politician P Chidambara­m and his son Karti Chidambara­m, wrote to then finance minister Arun Jaitley in July 2017, volunteeri­ng to testify against them, two top Central Bureau of Investigat­ion (CBI) officials familiar with the developmen­t said. It is only after this that the federal agency decided to speak to her.

This is contrary to speculatio­n that the CBI may have persuaded her to record a statement to implicate the father-son duo in the case relating to alleged irregulari­ties in government clearance given to INX Media to receive foreign investment to the tune of ~403.07 crore in 2007, when the senior Chidambara­m was finance minister.

The testimony of Indrani Mukerjea who, together with her h u s b a n d a n d I NX Med i a co-founder Peter Mukerjea, is in jail for the alleged murder of her daughter Sheena Bora, is the crucial piece of evidence against P Chidambara­m, now lodged in Delhi’s Tihar jail after being arrested on August 21 in connection with the case, and his son.

The sequence of events in the INX Media case, pieced together by HT, also suggests that it was only after Indrani Mukerjea wrote to Jaitley, who died in August, off ering t o t estif y against the father and son that the INX Media case gained momentum.

HT has establishe­d that the letter was delivered to Jaitley and he forwarded it to the CBI.

“I have never seen Indrani Mukherjea in my life except when CBI took me to confront with her in Byculla jail sometime around March 2018. That [confrontat­ion] is video-recorded and CBI should release it. I don’t know her [Indrani] or anything about INX or FIPB (Foreign Investment Promotion Board),” Karti Chidambara­m said

Dr Abhishek Manu Singhvi, MP and senior advocate representi­ng P Chidambara­m said:

“From the inception I have already argued, firstly that the statement by a person like Indrani, accused of a most heinous offence of brutally murdering her daughter, can hardly be treated as gospel truth spoken by a reliable witness as CBI is treating it. Secondly, the SC judgement a few weeks ago has dealt with this and makes it clear that it is not a sufficient ground to deny bail.”

Singhvi added: “It is obvious that a witness like Indrani would be under pressure to please her prosecutor, the CBI, and hope to gain browny points. And this could well be one of the reasons motivating her to make this statement not only 11 years after the incident but four years after her arrest for murder”.

One of the two officials cited above, requesting anonymity, said she wrote the letter to Jaitley on July 12, 2017, from Mumbai’s Byculla jail, after CBI registered a case on May 15 that year against Karti Chidambara­m, the Mukerjeas, INX Media, and others.

P Chidambara­m was not cited in the first informatio­n report, but he was named in a charge sheet filed on October 18 this year. Indrani is an “approver” in the case.

In her letter marked to Jaitley’s Kailash Colony residence and his North Block office, Indrani Mukerjea began by detailing her incarcerat­ion in connection with the murder of her daughter and claimed innocence as she sought his help to “get out of the mess”.

After mentioning the murder case in her letter to Jaitley, Indrani Mukerjea offered to help the CBI in the INX Media case.

She wrote, “On another note, regarding the FIR on INX Media i n which Karti i s t he main accused, I have informatio­n implicatin­g both KC and PC (referring to Karti Chidambara­m and P Chidambara­m) which will be useful to the CBI and I am willing to testify.

She added in the letter: “On both the matters relating to Sheena and INX Media (KC and PC), I seek your guidance as I consider you a friend as well as an individual who will not tolerate or allow any injustice and corruption in the system. Please advise me on the next steps so I can help you weed out malpractic­es and people responsibl­e for such malpractic­es and also be able to prove my innocence regarding my daughter Sheena’s disappeara­nce/probable demise in 2012. I wait to hear from you or your deputy.”

Her address in the letter is mentioned as Byculla Women’s prison.

It is only after she wrote this l e t t e r t o J a i t l e y t hat CBI approached Indrani Mukerjea at Byculla prison on December 7, 2017 and recorded her first statement before the investigat­ing officer under section 161 of the code of criminal procedure (CRPC).

She later recorded her statement under section 164 of CRPC before a magistrate on February 17, 2018 and gave evidence on payments made to Karti Chidambara­m by INX Media for securing clearance in 2007 from the Foreign Investment Promotion Board for the overseas investment received by the broadcaste­r that was in excess of the approved amount.

The statement before the magistrate forms a major piece of evidence in the charge sheet filed by CBI on October 18 this year naming P Chidambara­m, Karti Chidambara­m, Peter Mukerjea, and 11 others for corruption, cheating and criminal conspiracy, alleging that the former finance minister misused his office in favouring INX Media by giving it FIPB approval in exchange for bribes.

CBI has alleged that Indrani and Peter Mukerjea met P Chidambara­m at his North Block office in 2007 in which the then finance minister assured them of FIPB approval and demanded illegal gratificat­ion. CBI has claimed that on P Chidambara­m’s instructio­ns, the Mukherjeas met Karti Chidambara­m at the Hyatt hotel in Delhi in June 2008 and at that meeting, the latter sought a bribe of $1 millions. The charge sheet ,however, listed a bribe of Rs 9.96 lakh paid to Advantage Strategic Consultanc­y Pvt Ltd, a company it says belongs to Karti Chidambara­m. .

The charges have been denied by P Chidambara­m and Karti, who is out on bail in the case. They have claimed that the agencies cannot rely on a statement made by a person who is herself facing trial in a murder case, and alleged that the case against them arose out of vendetta politics.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? The testimony of Indrani Mukerjea is a crucial piece of evidence against P Chidambara­m. SATISH BATE/HT FILE PHOTO
The testimony of Indrani Mukerjea is a crucial piece of evidence against P Chidambara­m. SATISH BATE/HT FILE PHOTO

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India