Hindustan Times ST (Jaipur)

SC reserves verdict on Amazon’ pleas against Frl-reliance dea

- Press Trust of India

The Supreme Court Thursday reserved verdict on e-commerce giant Amazon’s pleas against the merger of Future Retail Ltd (FRL) with Reliance Retail and would rule whether Singapore’s Emergency Arbitrator (EA) award, restrainin­g the ₹24,731 crore deal, was valid under Indian law and can be enforced.

Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC and FRL are embroiled in a bitter legal fight over the deal and the Us-based firm has sought in the apex court that the EA award was valid and enforceabl­e.

“So we close the case now. The judgement is reserved,” a bench of justices R F Nariman and B R Gavai said after senior advocates Harish Salve and Gopal Subramaniu­m, appearing for FRL and Amazon respective­ly, concluded their submission­s in the case.

The top court, which had earlier asked the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) not to pass the final order related to regulatory approvals for the FRL-RRL amalgamati­on, commenced hearing the final arguments on July 20.

“We will decide whether EA award falls under section 17 (1) (which deals with interim award by arbitral tribunal) of the Arbitratio­n and Conciliati­on Act. And if yes, then whether it can be enforced under section 17 (2) (of the Act),” the bench said.

The provisions of the Act deal with the interim measures ordered by an arbitral tribunal and section 17 (1) says: “Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral tribunal may, at the request of a party, order a party to take any interim measure of protection as the arbitral tribunal may consider necessary in respect of the subject-matter of the dispute.” Section 17 (2) provides that the arbitral tribunal may require a party to provide appropriat­e security in connection with an interim measure ordered.

Salve, appearing for F referred to judgements on v ity and the enforceabi­lity of tral awards and said that t was no notion of EA under Indian law on arbitratio­n conciliati­on and, in any c there was no arbitratio­n ag ment to this effect.

There was no provision fo under the Indian Law an cannot be done by the proce constructi­on”, Salve said r ring to the single-judge ord the Delhi High Court which held the award of the EA t valid.

Amazon told the bench the Biyanis of Future Group negotiated with it to enter certain agreements and is bo by the EA award restrainin­g from going ahead with Reli Retail merger.

 ??  ?? Amazon told the bench that Future Group is bound by the EA award restrainin­g FRL from going ahead with Reliance merge
Amazon told the bench that Future Group is bound by the EA award restrainin­g FRL from going ahead with Reliance merge

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India