Losing one of the lions: CJI as Justice Nariman retires
“I feel like I am losing one of the lions that guarded the judicial institution”, Chief Justice N V Ramana said on Thursday while paying glowing tributes to Justice Rohinton Fali Nariman on his superannuation after over seven years at the Supreme Court bench.
Justice Nariman, who became the apex court judge on July 7, 2014, disposed of over 13,500 cases and delivered historic verdicts including declaration of privacy as fundamental right, setting aside of an IT Act provision empowering arrests, decriminalising consensual gay sex and permitting women of all ages to enter Kerala’s Sabarimala temple.
“I think I can conclude this reference with just one line: with brother Nariman’s retirement, I feel like I am losing one of the lions that guarded the judicial institution; one of the strong pillars of the contemporary Judicial System. He is a man of principles and is committed to what is right,” said the CJI who shared the bench with outgoing justice Nariman and Surya Kant for the ceremonial hearing at noon.
“Personally, I am a little overwhelmed and I am finding it difficult to express my thoughts in words,” the CJI said. Justice Ramana was effusive in his praise and broke the convention by permitted all the lawyers, besides Solicitor General Tushar Mehta and SCBA President Vikas Singh, who wanted to say few words in the honour of his retiring colleague. “I think there is no need to elaborate the impact brother Justice Nariman has had as a Judge of this Court. As a judge of the Supreme Court, he has disposed of nearly 13,565 cases. All I can state is that with judgments like Shreya Singhal (by which section 66A of the IT Act empowering police to arrest for social media posts was set aside), his opinions in Puttaswamy and Shayara Bano, he has left an indelible mark on the jurisprudence of the country.
“His judgments reflect his erudition, clarity of thought and scholarly approach. This institution will surely miss his knowledge and intellect,” the CJI said.
Retirement of luminaries such as Justice Nariman, who are “repositories of legal acumen”, makes one wonder if a person’s age is the appropriate yardstick to decide the tenure and time of retirement, he said. “We have seen just now the overwhelming response from the cross-section of the bar. I do not want to detain you for long, as I reserve my comments for the Supreme Court Bar Association function in the evening,” Justice Ramana said. The CJI referred to the excellent academic background of Justice Nariman and said he was made a senior advocate at the age of 37 years in 1993 by the then Chief Justice M N Venkatachaliah by amending the rule which fixes 45 years as minimum age for granting such a designation to a lawyer.
The CJI said that Justice Nariman had an “extremely successful practice” for over 35 years as a lawyer and was only the fifth lawyer to be directly elevated to the bench of the apex court.
At the outset, in the absence of Attorney General K K Venugopal, the Solicitor General delivered his farewell speech in the virtual function and recalled the fact that Justice Nariman was the first lawyer briefed by him in the apex court. He adding that the retiring judge has “exceptional brilliance and integrity “on varied subjects such as religions and constitutions”.