Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai) - Live

BBC row shows Indian politics has come a full circle

- Barkha Dutt

An intriguing­ly contradict­ory set of global headlines has captured the India story this fortnight. United States (US) President Joe Biden and French President Emmanuel Macron joined Prime Minister Narendra Modi in fronting the announceme­nt of a historic Air India aircraft order by the Tatas. The Indian Army made us proud, like always, with its boots on the ground for humanitari­an interventi­on in Turkey. The Adani-Hindenburg saga, allegation­s of market manipulati­on and murky politics led The New York Times to write a headline: Gautam Adani’s rise was intertwine­d with India’s. Now it’s unraveling. And finally, the tax survey on the British Broadcasti­ng Corporatio­n (BBC) opened the floodgates for a cascade of headlines on media freedom. The broadcaste­r has been muted in its public statements, only promising cooperatio­n and a vow to report without fear or favour.

In a week when arguably the world’s most powerful man announced that an Indian company will create a million jobs in the US, you have to wonder why the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) would want any media attention on the BBC story. The government and the ruling party have said that agencies are independen­t and proceed as per the law, underlinin­g that no one was above the law. But the aggressive response of the BJP raises questions. Wouldn’t it have wanted to savour this moment that upended the long-standing asymmetry of power with the West? Aren’t the images out of Turkey — children in an Indian field hospital embracing our soldiers — exactly what a compassion­ate global leader looks like? Why would you want to overshadow any of that with a party spokespers­on calling BBC a Bhrasht Bakwas Corporatio­n (corrupt, nonsense corporatio­n)? Isn’t this a pointless self-goal in a year when India is chairing the G20? Why would you want to open yourself to allegation­s of vendetta, with the tax action coming weeks after the organisati­on’s contentiou­s documentar­y on the 2002 Gujarat riots?

I had several of these questions too.

But on deeper thought, I would wager that the BJP believes this approach will not hurt it globally and will most likely benefit it domestical­ly.

It is no coincidenc­e that the BJP has reminded us of Indira Gandhi’s ban on BBC. Gandhi banned the British public broadcaste­r not once but twice. In 1970, two documentar­ies by Louis Malle, one of them on Calcutta, were seen to be slanted against and disparagin­g of India. During

Indira Gandhi banned BBC twice, claiming that vested foreign interests were trying to diminish the nation. Today, this theory is a weapon in the BJP’s political arsenal

the Emergency, Mark Tully, the BBC correspond­ent who has since made India his home, was expelled. Congress parliament­arians petitioned Gandhi to take action against BBC.

The BJP is not indifferen­t to the views of the foreign media; in fact, it is often rankled and irritated by it. But the party’s hardline base has long been invigorate­d by the othering of the press, especially the liberal media. This political narrative is even more effective when it comes to the foreign media. WhatsApp groups are replete with conspiracy theories about vested interests outside India that are converging to try and diminish the nation. Drawing room conversati­ons and even mainstream media debates wonder aloud about a Chinese hand. Some say it would not be beyond American lobbies to play saboteur.

That India has stood up to the world on the issue of purchasing Russian oil has added to this narrative. It’s the same reason why the foreign minister S Jaishankar is widely applauded — often across the political spectrum — every time he calls out western hypocrisy.

Of course, this moment is ironic for the BJP, so many of whose members went to jail against Gandhi’s Emergency. But the party appears to be counting on a short public memory. In any case, current generation­s scarcely recall the Emergency and the paradoxes of the BJP’s position today could pass without much comment.

It’s uncanny to revisit some of the speeches from that time. In 1976, at a public rally, Gandhi spoke about foreign powers that wanted to “always run down India, belittle its achievemen­ts, whether the launch of Aryabhata or the Pokhran nuclear test”. “As prime minister I can say, the more they try to suppress us or oppose us, the more strong and united we will be,” she added. The headline on the front page of the Indian Express newspaper from March 3 that year read, “Foreign critics told to stop interferen­ce”. The headlines in February 2023 noted India’s law minister Kiren Rijiju criticisin­g those who “trust foreign news agencies, but not trust Indian agencies.” “They swear by the BBC but they won’t believe Indian courts,” the minister said.

Politics has turned full circle. And the foreign hand theory, popularise­d by Gandhi, is today a weapon in the BJP’s armament.

The tax action against BBC and the BJP’s response may seem to some journalist­s like a sledgehamm­er response; but to those taking decisions in the party, it may well be consciousl­y calculated politics.

Barkha Dutt is an award-winning journalist and author The views expressed are personal

 ?? WILLIAM BARTON / SHUTTERSTO­CK ?? The tax action against BBC and the BJP’s response may seem to some journalist­s like a sledgehamm­er response; but to those taking decisions in the party, it may well be consciousl­y calculated politics
WILLIAM BARTON / SHUTTERSTO­CK The tax action against BBC and the BJP’s response may seem to some journalist­s like a sledgehamm­er response; but to those taking decisions in the party, it may well be consciousl­y calculated politics

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India