Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai) - Live

After CBI, Sisodia remanded to ED custody in excise case

- Deepankar Malviya and Neeraj Chauhan

NEW DELHI: A Delhi court on Friday allowed the Enforcemen­t Directorat­e to take custody of former deputy chief minister Manish Sisodia till March 17 to interrogat­e him over money laundering charges stemming from the probe into the Delhi excise policy 2021-22.

Sisodia, who was in Tihar after being sent to judicial remand following his questionin­g by the Central Bureau of Investigat­ion, was due for a bail hearing on Friday but had been arrested by ED following an eight-hour long interrogat­ion on Thursday.

The AAP leader was first arrested by CBI on February 26 over the allegation­s that he and his party have called fake.

Advocate Zoheb Hossain, appearing for ED, alleged that when the excise policy was being drawn up, an expert committee’s recommenda­tions were not considered and the profit margins were changed (from 5% to 12%) in order to ensure some private entities of the alleged “South Group” made a profit.

He also alleged that the call for public opinion on the policy was “eye wash”, and added that Sisodia needs to be confronted with three or four officers who have recorded their statements.

Sisodia, as excise minister, played a key role in the definition of “related entities” being diluted, a move that enabled cartelisat­ion and the allotment of licence to a company called Indospirit, the lawyer contended. This company, he added, was a vehicle for “the recoupment of kickbacks”.

Hossain also submitted that people accused in the case destroyed digital evidence and that 12 mobile phones (with evidence of the irregulari­ties) were destroyed in one year. This, the lawyer contended, was among the reasons why ED required Sisodia’s custody in order to follow the money trail, in addition to his “evasive and untrue” answers.

The remand applicatio­n was opposed by senior advocates Dayan Krishnan, Mohit Mathur and Siddharth Aggarwal, representi­ng the former deputy CM. Krishnan submitted before the court that ED had not found any trace of money linked to Sisodia. “Let us not forget the distinctio­n between the predicate offence and the offence of money laundering, it is their (ED) duty to show the tracing of money to him,” he said.

“This is about a faulty policy. I can give you umpteen examples of haste in policy formulatio­n. Look at demonetiza­tion (referring to November 2016 demonetiza­tion by the National Democratic Alliance government). How does a call by government to make a policy is criminal? How is it money laundering?” Krishnan argued.

He submitted that the policy went through several layers of scrutiny, including that of the government, bureaucrac­y, finance, legal and the lieutenant governor, who raised questions that did not pertain to profit margin or eligibilit­y criteria.

Responding to allegation­s of Sisodia being evasive, Krishnan, on behalf of Sisodia, submitted: “I can say what I know, I can’t say what they want to hear.”

Mathur supported Krishnan’s arguments and questioned the legality of the arrest, saying ED does not have the power to arrest. Aggarwal also pointed out that the copy of the ground of arrest was not supplied, making the arrest illegal.

The agency has attributed proceeds of crime worth Rs 292.8 crore, which it said were likely to increase during investigat­ion, to Manish Sisodia in the form of Rs 100 crore kickbacks received from the South Group and undue profits worth Rs 192.8 crore to Indospirit­s Group of businessma­n Sameer Mahendru.

Chief minister Arvind Kejriwal on Friday compared Sisodia to Prahlad, a king in Hindu mythology, and said Hiranyakas­hyap, a mythical demon, (the BJP) would not be able to stop him “from the path of God”.

The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), meanwhile, alleged that chief minister Arvind Kejriwal was the mastermind of the alleged scam and demanded his resignatio­n. On Friday, Delhi BJP working president Virendra Sachdeva and several party leaders protested near AAP headquarte­rs and said they will continue to do so till the CM resigns. “BJP workers first fought for the resignatio­n of Manish Sisodia, and now we are demanding the resignatio­n of Arvind Kejriwal because Kejriwal himself is the kingpin and mastermind of this entire liquor scam,” said Sachdeva.

The Delhi government’s 2021-22 excise policy aimed to revitalise the city’s flagging liquor business by handing the retail alcohol business entirely to private companies and allowing market forces to improve customer experience and drive down prices.

But the plan came to an abrupt end when the current LG VK Saxena recommende­d a CBI probe into alleged irregulari­ties in the regime. In August, CBI in its FIR listed Delhi deputy CM Manish Sisodia as an accused in the case. Sisodia and the Aam Aadmi Party have dismissed the probe as a politicall­y motivated witch-hunt.

 ?? PTI ?? AAP leader Manish Sisodia at a Delhi court on Friday.
PTI AAP leader Manish Sisodia at a Delhi court on Friday.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India