Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

Will not replace

Too late to make change in squad; wrestler’s complaint alleging sabotage forwarded to government

- Vinayak Padmadeo

NEW DELHI: Narsingh Yadav’s doping infringeme­nt that rules him out of the Olympics doesn’t mean Sushil Kumar, the country’s most successful individual Olympian, gets a shot at the Rio Games.

The Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) has rejected the idea of naming a replacemen­t in the 74kg category should NADA’S antidoping disciplina­ry panel penalise Narsingh with a ban.

“There is no question of naming Narsingh’s replacemen­t. We are only waiting for the final verdict in the case,” WFI president Brij Bhushan Sharan Singh told HT on Sunday.

Singh said the onus will be on the ‘conspirato­rs’ if India goes unrepresen­ted. “Those responsibl­e for this dope shame will have to answer if we fail to field a wrestler in Rio in this weight category.”

WRITTEN COMPLAINT

The WFI president said Narsingh has filed a written complaint. “In a written complaint he has claimed that he has been framed. We have forwarded it to the Government of India, which is probing the matter. People who are involved may think that Narsingh’s dope test is a small matter, but it is not. We will see to it that those who have conspired for this failed dope test will pay heavily,” Singh said.

Sushil’s name wouldn’t have gone as a replacemen­t even otherwise once the window for the last date of sport entries closed on July 18.

Interestin­gly, sources have raised doubts about WFI’S motives, alleging that it came to know of Narsingh’s failed test by July 17. It waited for July 18 to pass to ward off any pressure from Sushil’s camp. But the WFI chief said he got to know of the matter only on July 19.

This perhaps ended Sushil’s last hope. Since Sushil’s name wasn’t mentioned in the probables list sent to the Indian Olympic Associatio­n (IOA) by the WFI, it ruled him out.

The Internatio­nal Olympic Committee rule states that only those names sent as part of the tentative list will be entertaine­d as per its late athlete replacemen­t policy. The WFI, sources said, has sent Jitender’s name as cover in the 74kg category.

“The NOC of the replacemen­t athlete had applied successful­ly for accreditat­ion for the athlete prior to 29 April (accreditat­ion applicatio­n deadline). As such, the replacemen­t athlete has been registered by Rio 2016 in “NOC’S athlete accreditat­ion long list”, the rule states.

The public spat between the federation officials and Sushil over his demand to hold trials has also dented any outside chance he has of going to Rio. The WFI denied Sushil trials to stake claim for the Rio slot. Sushil petitioned the Delhi high court but it ruled that Yadav had already qualified for the Games.

‘WE WILL SEE’

Sushil’s mentor and father-inlaw, Satpal, rubbished rumours he had engineered this dope shocker. “I would have ensured that the federation agreed to our demands of holding trials, if I had the clout that many say I have. He flunked a test and all this talk that he is being framed is an attempt to deflect attention from that. As a senior athlete he should have taken all precaution­s. It is shameful to hear that such a senior athlete has been caught. Wrestling’s stature in India has been hurt,” Satpal told HT.

When asked whether Sushil was ready to represent India if the situation arises, he said the WFI and the sports ministry will have to decide. “It’s up to them. We will only think about it if we are approached by the federation or the ministry.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India