Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

Nada officials were chased away from Sonepat

- Navneet Singh

NEW DELHI: Four months back when the National Antidoping Agency (NADA) officials knocked at the doors of the Sports Authority of India’s (SAI) Sonepat centre in Haryana to collect urine samplesof wrestlersp­reparing for Rio, they were reportedly intimidate­d and beat a hasty retreat. The country’s top wrestlers refused to give their urine samples for out-of-competitio­n testing, giving rise to speculatio­n that there was something wrong. Then Nada chief, Rajvir Singh, it is learnt, reported the incident to SAI’S top officials, including regional director Radhika Sreeman.

Top Wrestling Federation of India (WFI) officials too were apprised of the incident, which could have had far reaching repercussi­ons had NADA taken stern action. According to the new World Anti-doping Agency (WADA) anti-violation rules, three missed tests in a year is equivalent to a positive test, translatin­g into a fouryear suspension from active competitio­n.

The Nada chief could also have marked the wrestlers absent, but he let them off with a verbal warning. Though the Nada officials returned to collect the samples after a few days, it reportedly gave time to the athletes to ‘manage things’. The federation neither issued a warning to the wrestlers nor did it ask the wrestlers to show cause as to why they tried to oppose the sample collection if they were clean.

Had the WFI taken a serious note of the episode and examined the dietary supplement­s of the grapplers, the Narsingh Yadav embarrassm­ent could have been averted.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India