Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

Will govt follow heart to cap other devices?

After regulating stent prices, patients hope that authoritie­s will turn to overpriced pacemakers, knee and hip implants and cataract surgery lenses

- Aayushi Pratap

On February 13, the Union government capped prices of stents — a tiny metal tube inserted into the narrowed coronary arteries — by nearly 85%, drasticall­y reducing the cost of angioplast­y.

The price cap is just one example of how a life-saving medical device can be made affordable when the government intervenes to regulate prices. Prior to the price capping, a stent contribute­d heavily to the cost of an angioplast­y. A patient had to shell out anywhere between Rs50,000 and Rs1.5 lakh for a stent, depending on its brand and range. But, now, no stent, however advanced, can cost more than Rs30,000.

The fall in the price of stents has brought relief to patients with a heart ailment, but other medical devices that are equally lifesaving or essential to improving health are still unaffordab­le because their prices are not regulated by the government.

For example, in cardiac care, a convention­al pacemaker costs in the range of Rs40,000 to Rs2.3 lakh. Pacemaker is a small device that is placed in the chest or abdomen to help control abnormal heart beats. According to industry sources, this cost is almost 40% more than its import price and follows a ‘market methodolog­y’ — a term referring to an arbitrary pricing decided by hospitals. “Pacemakers are as life-saving as stents. But the cost is definitely a financial burden on patients. They have to take up loans or pay for the device on EMI basis,” said a senior cardiologi­st at a hospital in Vile Parle.

Similarly, orthopedic implants and intraocula­r lenses are other medical devices which burn big holes in a patient’s pocket.

Hindustan Times has learnt that the MRP of an imported knee implant is anywhere between Rs 90,000 and Rs2 lakh, which is over 300% of its import cost, according to a dealer.

Dr Pradeep Bhosale, head of hip and joint replacemen­t surgery at Nanavati Hospital, said the number of knee and hip replacemen­t surgeries in India has increased by 600 times in the past five years, but implants continue to be expensive for patients.

“We often choose imported implants owing to their better longevity.therearema­nyindian companies that now manufactur­e these implants, and they are nearly 40% cheaper compared to the imported ones,” he said.

Bhosale added that doctors have their reservatio­ns about using Indian implants as there are no long-term clinical trials to prove that they are at par with products approved by the Food and Drugs Administra­tion .

Another essential medical device where there is a wide gap in the import cost and the final price paid by patients is intraocula­r lens. The heavily-priced intra- ocular lenses contribute­s to a major portion of the cost of cataract surgeries.

On the price regulation by the government, doctors argue that medical devices such as intraocula­r lenses, and knee and hip implants, are neither essential nor life saving, but a means to improve quality of life. “These devices are essential for good quality of life,” said an ophthalmol­ogist from a hospital in south Mumbai.

Dr Abhay Shukla, from Jan Swasthiya Abhiyan has questioned why these devices, which have catastroph­ic economic implicatio­ns on a patient, are not included under the National List of essential medicines (NLEM), by the ministry of health and family welfare. Once a device is included under NLEM, the National Pharmaceut­ical Pricing Authority (NPPA) can regulate its prices by more than 10%.

Giving an example of a injection syringe, Dr Shukla said, “It is manufactur­ed at Rs2, but its MRP is between Rs15 and Rs20. No doubt, a patient ends up paying ten times more than its manufactur­ing cost, but its economic implicatio­n is very little on the patient,” he said.

“But, when you look at medical devices and implants whose cost runs in lakhs, then the patient feels a big financial pinch. These are the products prices of which the government must regulate,” he added. Two doctors have pointed out that as a device moves from a manufactur­er to a patient, hospital earns the maximum commission. “Hospitals and doctors earn the highest margin. They sometimes buy devices from distributo­rs,” said Dr Arun Gadre, a city gynaecolog­ist.

While the NPPA is already

looking at regulating the prices of orthopedic implants and intraocula­r lenses, an industry insider from Hyderabad, said the capping of prices of pacemakers will be tough.

“There are many local manufactur­ers for orthopedic implants and lenses who can step in if the multi-national players withdraw. However, with pacemakers, there are just one or two Indian manufactur­ers,” he said.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India