Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

Tiger panel seeks filming ban on BBC, no visa to producer Rowlatt

- Malavika Vyawahare

THE BBC REPORT ALLEGED THAT THERE WAS AN UNOFFICIAL “SHOOT AT SIGHT” POLICY IN PLACE AT KAZIRANGA NATIONAL PARK THAT ALLOWED FOREST GUARDS TO GUN DOWN PEOPLE WHO APPEARED TO BE A THREAT TO WILDLIFE

NEW DELHI:: Following banning the BBC from filming in tiger reserves, the National Tiger Conservati­on Authority (NTCA) has advised the Ministry of Environmen­t to ban them from filming in all protected areas for the same period.

The NTCA has also recommende­d the Ministry of External Affairs not to renew BBC south Asia correspond­ent Justin Rowlatt’s visa, which is up for renewal in March.

Rowlatt’s documentar­y titled Killing for Conservati­on on the aggressive use of force in conservati­on efforts in the Kaziranga National Park in Assam pitched the broadcaste­r against the government and has left both parties licking their wounds.

The BBC report alleged that there was an unofficial “shoot at sight” policy in place at Kaziranga National Park that allowed forest guards to gun down people who appeared to be a threat to wildlife.

An official at the NTCA described it as a “breach of trust,” and said that “BBC had hoodwinked the authoritie­s to get permission”.

Permission to shoot was granted with an undertakin­g that the broadcaste­r would share the film with the ministry of environmen­t before broadcasti­ng, which Rowlatt didn’t do.

On February 13, the NTCA had called for a blacklist of Rowlatt, who is BBC’S south Asia bureau chief and lives in Delhi with his wife and four kids.

The NTCA accused the BBC of “not working constructi­vely with the government of India which has resulted in the portraying of conservati­on efforts in India in extremely negative light.” BBC has maintained that they were not bound to show the finished film to the authoritie­s, and would have done so if any of the officials had requested them to do so.

The NTCA also accused the network of grossly misreprese­nting its personnel and policies and demanded that the documentar­y be taken off the air and removed online.

While the focus of the documentar­y is the allegedly aggressive policy adopted by the national park in its conservati­on efforts, the NTCA’S response has centred on the violation of the terms of the contract. NTCA also pointed out that the BBC did not have permission to film after dark, and they did so.

It was revealed in the weeks following the release of the docu mentary that Corbett Tiger Reserve in Uttarakhan­d had also issued directions to forest ran gers that could be construed as “shoot at sight.” However, in that case the director of the Cor bett Tiger Reserve was fired for issuing these orders on how to deal with poachers.

NTCA officials also objected to the prominence given to the figure of 50 people killed by forest guards in the past 3 years and said it presented a “one-sided view.” A much higher number of poachers were apprehende­d and large stash of ammunition and cash has been recovered in the past decade, according to an NTCA official.

BBC replied to the show cause notice on Feb. 14 but refused to back down and remove the docu mentary, leading the NTCA to act on its proposal to deny per missions to the British broad caster.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India