A revolutionary road that Maoists hate
On March 11, 12 CRPF troopers guarding road work in Bastar were killed; now the team is back on duty
among the force and a switch to search teams is made depending on operational assessment.
The Injiram-bheji ambush has forced a strategy rethink. “We have changed our strategy and the situation is under control. The construction work restarted within 10 days, which is commendable,” said Awasthi.
CRPF troops are stationed in four camps in the area. The road will be the game changer, giving security forces swift access to remote locations and aid combing operations. Maoists know this and Injiram-bheji will remain on their radar. Authorities expect work on the road to be completed in about a year.
Of the 20 km stretch, the state’s public works department built 7 km four years ago before abandoning work because no contractor was willing to take up the project. Now, Chhattisgarh Police Housing Corporation Limited (CPHCL) has taken charge of the work. “A local contractor has dared to start the work,” said a young CPHCL engineer at the ambush site. To prevent Maoists from digging up the road to plant landmines, the CPHCL is making the stretch a concrete cement (CC) one instead of a damur (tar) one. “A CC road is costlier than a damur road but it is more difficult to dig. We know that Maoists will want to plant bombs,” said the engineer.
Contractor Pramod, who has taken up the road work, told HT, “I know I am on the hit list of Maoists, but the situation will change after the road is built.” Getting work done, however, is not easy. “No one wants to come here and work. I have more than 200 staff here and all of them are from Uttar Pradesh. I have to pay them more than the usual rate,” Pramod added.
If an airline can shut its doors for passengers who get late even by a minute, why shouldn’t a customer get compensated if a flight gets delayed by an hour?
The Supreme Court has asked the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) to examine the question and come out with a pol icy for domestic carriers to stop “harassment” of passengers who are left high and dry in case of a flight delay.
At present, DGCA rules make it mandatory for an airline to refund passenger money if the flight gets late by nine hours.
A bench headed by justice MB Lokur asked DGCA to look at the policy again and formulate a new one. “Something needs to be done. Passengers are being har assed,” the bench said.
The court was hearing a peti tion filed by Nanita Sharma, who said there should be new guide lines because the current ones heavily favoured airlines.
Sharma has dragged Goair to the top court and demanded com pensation from the airline for being left stranded at the Mumba airport in 2007 after her flight got delayed by four hours.
Goair counsel, senior advo cate Sanjeev Sen, told the bench that since Sharma’s plea amounted to re-formulating the policy, the DGCA should invite all companies and hold discus sions before finalising rules.
Sharma has questioned the clauses in the policy that do not obligate an airline to pay in cases of cancellations and delays due to extraordinary circumstances beyond the airline’s control.