Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

‘Dissent a symbol of vibrant democracy’

-

NEW DELHI : Dissent is a symbol of “vibrant democracy” and the voices in opposition cannot be “muzzled” by persecutin­g those who take up unpopular causes, Justice D Y Chandrachu­d of the Supreme Court said Friday in his dissenting judgment in the Koregaon-bhima violence case.

Justice Chandrachu­d, writing a separate minority verdict in which he disagreed with the views of Chief Justice Dipak Misra and Justice AM Khanwilkar, said that individual­s asserting causes which might be unpopular to the echelons of power were entitled to the freedoms guaranteed under the Constituti­on.

He made it clear, however, that when expression of dissent enters the “prohibited field” of incitement to violence or subversion of a democratic­ally elected government by recourse to unlawful means, the dissent “ceases to be a mere expression of opinion”.

The Supreme Court Friday refused to interfere with the arrest of five rights activists by the Maharashtr­a Police in connection with the Koregaonbh­ima violence case and declined to appoint a SIT to probe their arrest.

Observing that a special investigat­ing team (SIT) must be appointed to conduct probe in the case, Justice Chandrachu­d said that court acts as a “watchdog” to ensure impartial and fair investigat­ion as it was crucial for preservati­on of rule of law and liberty.

Terming as “serious” the allegation­s levelled by Pune Police that arrested the accused were plotting to attack PM Narendra Modi, Justice Chandrachu­d said this aspect required “responsibl­e attention” and it cannot be “bandied” about by the police officers in media briefings.

“Dissent is a symbol of a vibrant democracy. Voices in opposition cannot be muzzled by persecutin­g those who take up unpopular causes. Where, however, the expression of dissent enters upon the prohibited field of an incitement to violence or the subversion of a democratic­ally elected government by recourse to unlawful means, the dissent ceases to be a mere expression of opinion,” Justice Chandrachu­d said in his 43-page verdict.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India