Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

Why no vet present when tigress was shot, asks Maha veterinary council

- Badri Chatterjee

MUMBAI:THE Maharashtr­a State Veterinary Council (MSVC) has asked why a veterinari­an was not present when the tigress T1 was shot dead on November 2 in Yavatmal. This comes a day after the Veterinary Council of India (VCI), a statutory body under the Union agricultur­e ministry, issued a notice to the registrar of MSVC in Nagpur on Friday, to examine inconsiste­ncies and alleged violations of veterinary laws when T1 was shot and killed by a private hunter.

Dr Shirish Chitte, registrar of MSVC, told HT that the council will “initiate a detailed investigat­ion into the alleged lapses that the forest department has not been able to prove.” “We will also study the tiger’s preliminar­y post-mortem report. Based on the inquiry, a report will be submitted to VCI and the environmen­t ministry within eight to

10 days,” said Dr. Chitte.

Two committees have already been set up by the National Tiger Conservati­on Authority (NTCA) and the Maharashtr­a government respective­ly, to investigat­e the circumstan­ces surroundin­g the killing of T1. Neither committee has a veterinari­an among its members. “If the subject of this entire investigat­ion is a tiger, it is impossible to come to conclusion­s without veterinary

officers. It is imperative that MSVC appoints expert vets from across the country and that will be the only relevant report,” said Gauri Maulekhi, trustee of People for Animals, a non-profit organisati­on founded by Union minister Maneka Gandhi.

HT had reported on Thursday that the National Veterinary Doctors’ Associatio­n had served a similar notice to Maharashtr­a’s principal chief conservato­r of forest (wildlife), for the breach of the Indian Veterinary Council Act, 1984. VCI said they issued the notice to MSVC after taking cognisance of that letter and Gandhi’s criticism of how T1 was killed.

“The state council needs to take action against forest officers who were in violation of the Indian Veterinary Council Act, 1984 and Narcotics and Psychotrop­ic Substances Act of 1985 as only a registered veterinary practition­er could have tranquilli­sed T1, not a hired hunter,” said a senior VCI official.

AK Misra, principal chief conservato­r of forest (wildlife) said he had not seen any of the notices. “We have not been able to read any notices from any of the councils yet since we have been on field and all our efforts are to capture T1’s cubs,” said Misra. He also said that there was no need for “debate” since two committees are already investigat­ing the incident.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India