Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

Avni not shot in self-defence: Tiger panel

- Badri Chatterjee

MUMBAI: Refuting the forest department’s claims that tigress T-1 or Avni was killed in self-defence on November 2, the final report by the independen­t committee constitute­d by the National Tiger Conservati­on Authority (NTCA) revealed that she was killed deliberate­ly and the darting process was illegal.

“The dart was fired from approximat­ely 12.8 metres when T-1 was on its natural path, crossing the road. T-1 continued movement after darting on its path while snarling and growling at the team, probably due to the dart’s disturbanc­e, moving vehicle and spotlight. Within 3-5 seconds, [Asghar Ali] Khan took one of the guns and shot T-1 from the moving vehicle in sitting position. T-1 was stunned by the impact and died on the spot,” read the report. “In view of the facts, the firing in self-defence is doubtful.” The analysis said, “T-1 was moving away from the road and vehicle on its traditiona­l walk path while it was shot. The shot was taken in a hurry by the inexperien­ced Khan (son of independen­t sharpshoot­er Nawab Shafat Ali Khan).”

HT has a copy of the 12-page report that PV Subramania­m and Sarita Subramania­m from animal welfare group Earth Brigade Foundation procured by filing an RTI. HT had reported on Wednesday that the investigat­ion committee constitute­d by NTCA flagged off several violations during the killing of T-1 and a notice had been issued to chief wildlife warden, Maharashtr­a, regarding the violation of the Wildlife Protection Act 1972, Arms Act 1959, and NTCA standard operating procedures in man-animal conflict situations.

The report further said that it was evident from the provisiona­l post-mortem report that the bullet trajectory was at an obtuse angle from the side of the animal entering from the back side of the left scapula (shoulder blade) and penetratin­g towards the front of

right scapula. The committee observed that the drugs used for tranquilli­sing T-1 were handled by unauthoris­ed personnel who are not supposed to handle or use the same.

“The darting of T-1 by Mukbhir Sheikh (forest staff) is unauthoris­ed, as he was authorised to identify T-1 or her cubs,” the report said, adding that the dart fired by Sheikh was used after a lapse of 56 hours. “Mukhbir Sheikh or Khan did not care for the advice of the expert.”

T-1 was seen multiple times on November 2 during the daytime and could have been darted, the report stated.

“Despite this, no proper planning was done for darting and capture of T-1 and cubs. There was no wildlife manager, veterinari­an or biologist in the team. The team was not equipped to deal with the sedated tiger, did not have reversal drugs, stretcher, capture cage, net, and manpower to locate T-1 after tranquilli­sation. The rapid response team was not available,” the report said adding that they are all violations of NTCA SOP guidelines.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India