Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

TIME LINE OF THE DISPUTE

-

2005 – Adarsh allegedly got the power of attorney from Abdul Rashid, co-executor of Sir Yusuf Khot’s estate to the Kanjur Village property. An agreement to that effect was also entered into between Adarsh and executors of the estate 2006 – Adarsh move HC seeking specific performanc­e of the 2005 agreement 2006 – Executors dispute power of attorney, agreement and deny receiving ₹11 lakh towards the developmen­t agreement

2006 – HC orders both Adarsh and estate executors to maintain status quo 2012 – Abdul Rashid dies, his brother Faruq Abdul is the remaining executor

2018 – Faruq Abdul files a private complaint in the Mulund metropolit­an magistrate court. The court directs registrati­on of FIR against directors of Adarsh 2018 – Adarsh directors tell HC that original documents of power of attorney and developmen­t agreement are lost, give photocopie­s 2018 – Court directs Faruq Abdul to inspect photocopie­s of the documents

2018 - Abdul informs court that documents are forged, interpolat­ed, fabricated.

of the power of attorney and agreement furnished by Adarsh revealed that they were fabricated and interpolat­ed and when the original documents were sought from Adarsh, they submitted that the originals were lost. The inspection also revealed there was a difference in the documents submitted in 2006 and the photocopie­s provided by Adarsh recently, he said.

In light of the submission­s, the bench not only restrained Adarsh from violating the status quo but also directed the collector, tehsildar, talathi and superinten­dent of land records from effecting any changes to the record books. It then posted the matter for hearing on January 10.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India