Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

Case for paid leaves for the quarantine­d

- Abhishek Jha

NEW DELHI: With the number of those infected by the novel coronaviru­s increasing in the country, it is likely that more people will be quarantine­d in the days to come. This is because it is not just the person who tests positive for the disease who needs to be isolated to prevent further transmissi­on, but also those who come in close contact with the person.

To facilitate this, Delhi chief minister Arvind Kejriwal on Sunday appealed to employers to give paid leave to quarantine­d people so that their livelihood was not affected.

Why is such an appeal necessary? Data from the Periodic Labour Force Survey (PLFS), conducted in 2017-18, showed that among salaried and casual wage workers, as many as 72% were not eligible for paid leave.

The survey did not ask the question to people who were selfemploy­ed or those who were engaged in non-skilled agricultur­al jobs. These workers constitute 63% of all workers and their work doesn’t involve taking leave from an employer.

The headline figure of 72% hides the fact that there is a vast difference in paid leave eligibilit­y among the casual wage workers and the salaried or regular wage earners.

Among casual wage workers, who form 39.5% of those to whom the question was asked, 98% were not eligible for paid leave.

This is to be expected because these workers are paid on daily or periodic work contracts. However, if such workers are quarantine­d for the prescribed twoweek period, they could lose 15 days’ wages.

The situation is not great even among the salaried or those receiving regular wages. Over half (54%) of such workers were not eligible for paid leave, according to the survey.

An occupation-wise breakup of the salaried, and those not eligible for paid leave, suggests that people who are less skilled don’t get paid leave even when getting regular wages. Eighty-three per cent of plant and machine operators and assemblers who the survey spoke to, for example, earned regular wages. Still, 77% of them did not get paid leave. An epidemic such as coronaviru­s, therefore, further highlights class difference­s between workers. A state-wise break-up shows that such interventi­ons will be more important in poorer states. While only half of the workers in states such as Delhi and Maharashtr­a were not eligible for paid leaves, the share was over 80% in Jharkhand, Rajasthan, and Uttar Pradesh, according to the survey.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India