Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

Allowing firms to list overseas may help raise funds

- Jayshree P Upadhyay & Swaraj Singh Dhanjal letters@hindustant­imes.com

TO CURB COSTS

INDIAN ENTITIES HAVE SO FAR USED OFFSHORE ROUTES TO LIST ON OVERSEAS EXCHANGES BY CREATING PARENT FIRMS IN TAX-FRIENDLY JURISDICTI­ONS

government’s policy intent to allow Indian companies to list overseas without simultaneo­us India listing can open up avenues for tech and other companies to raise funds but would be a non-starter without the necessary regulatory clarificat­ions, legal experts said.

Historical­ly, due to the existing legal framework, Indian entities have used offshore routes like Mauritius to list on overseas exchanges like NASDAQ and NYSE by creating parent companies or subsidiari­es in such taxfriendl­y jurisdicti­ons.

Apart from that, Indian entities are also allowed access to foreign capital through the American Depository Receipts (ADR) or Global Depository Receipts (GDR) route.

“While tech firms would be the key beneficiar­ies, some others with significan­t US exposure, in terms of customers or employees such as IT services, healthcare, or global business models in commoditie­s, chemicals could look at foreign listings,” said Anuj Kapoor, managing director and head of investment banking at UBS India.

The cabinet approved this proposal in March. The idea’s genesis is a Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) panel recommenda­tion from December 2018. The panel had suggested listing Indian companies abroad would require simultaneo­us easing of provisions of taxation and Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA), among others.

FEMA regulation­s need to be tweaked to allow issuance of shares to persons resident outside India and receipt and retention of amounts received in foreign currency accounts overseas.

Further, tax laws both relating to capital gains arising on transfer of equity shares and also the rules relating to valuation of shares require changes.

“The announceme­nt so far looks to be more of policy intent till the time the associated regulatory amendments and clarificat­ions are not announced in areas including FEMA regulation­s and tax laws,” said Sai Venkateshw­aran, partner and head, CFO Advisory, KPMG in India.

Kapoor of UBS also said the government and regulators will need to do substantia­l work on fine-tuning the ecosystem.

The other big hurdle is lack of a fully convertibl­e rupee. The RBI has allowed foreign exchangese­ttled rupee derivative­s trading only at the Internatio­nal Financial Services Centre at Gift City in Gujarat.

minister Nirmala Sitharaman on Sunday said the government’s technology-driven direct benefit transfer (DBT) has been crucial in implementi­ng the PM Garib Kalyan Yojana aimed to help the poor amid the coronaviru­s crisis. “The PM Garib Kalyan (scheme) used the technology available and was therefore able to do direct benefit transfers for various categories … DBT was implemente­d with missionary zeal in the last four years. Otherwise, this wouldn’t have been possible.”

As many as 22 million constructi­on workers received financial support of ₹3,950 crore, Sitharaman said. “The money was directly transferre­d in their accounts. This was possible because of DBT.”

As on 16 May, one-time transfer of ₹2,000 each was provided to 81.9 million beneficiar­ies under the Pm-kisan scheme, which amounted to over ₹16,000 crore. As many as 200 million account holders of Jan Dhan Accounts will receive ₹500 for three months, out of which ₹10,025 crore has already been transferre­d.

“We responded immediatel­y by giving foodgrain, cash, cylinders ... state government­s, Nafed (National Agricultur­al Cooperativ­e Marketing Federation of India), and FCI (Food Corporatio­n of India), amid logistical challenges, made a lot of effort to give upfront grains to those in need,” the minister said.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India