Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

‘EXTRADITIO­N...

-

“India presumably could have agreed to forgo Headley’s extraditio­n in return for his assistance to the US, but there is no indication in the record that it did so,” the court submission stated.

“In fact, the opinion of the Indian prosecutor serving as the government’s expert states: “The present opinion is specific to the extraditio­n request in respect of fugitive Tahawwur Hussain Rana. This opinion may not be construed in any manner to indicate that the various extraditio­n requests pending with different sovereign nations in respect of the abovementi­oned case which includes the case in respect of Accused No. 1, David Coleman Headley, is either being given up or not being pursued vigorously,” said the motion filed by his attorneys.

Pakistani-american Lashkare-taiba (LET) terrorist Headley was involved in plotting the 2008 Mumbai terror attack. He was made an approver in the case, and is currently serving a 35-year prison term in the US for his role in the attack.

Rana’s attorneys said that the Court should not lightly assume (as the government appears to suggest) that the government circumvent­ed its treaty obligation to India through “a sham interpreta­tion” of Article 6 of the India-us Extraditio­n Treaty as part of its deal with Headley.

The government’s conclusion in Headley’s plea agreement that Article 6 defines offences in terms of conduct rather than elements and thus bars Headley’s extraditio­n must be taken as its good-faith interpreta­tion of the Treaty’s terms, it said. Rana, in the court filing, described Headley as a liar. Headley lied to federal agents, judges, and presumably prosecutor­s in relation to these cases. After his first heroin sentence (reduced because of his cooperatio­n), he went back to dealing heroin.

“He disregarde­d the agents’ instructio­ns regarding his dealings with targets and travelled to Pakistan without permission. After his second heroin conviction, he used his status as a DEA cooperator to deflect government scrutiny of his activities with Lashkar and his statements supporting jihad,” his lawyers alleged.

A

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India