Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

‘Not woke’ on same-sex relationsh­ips: HC judge to talk to psychologi­st

- Divya Chandrabab­u

CHENNAI: A Madras high court judge on Wednesday fixed an appointmen­t with a psychologi­st to understand same-sex orientatio­n better before recording his judgment in a case pertaining to a lesbian couple who sought protection from their birth families that are opposed to their relationsh­ip, and directed the police to close the first informatio­n report filed on the basis of a missing person’s complaint filed by the parents of both women.

Justice N Anand Venkatesh said that he would want to undergo an educationa­l session with Vidhya Dinakaran, a city-based psychologi­st, while hearing the petition.

“Ultimately in this case, the words must come from my heart and not from my head, and the same will not be possible if I am not fully “woke” on this aspect,” justice Venkatesh said. “For this purpose, I want to subject myself for psycho-education with Vidhya Dinakaran, and I would request the psychologi­st to fix a convenient appointmen­t for the same. I honestly feel that such a session with a profession­al will help me understand same-sex relationsh­ips better and will pave way for my evolution. If I write an order after undergoing psycho-education, I trust that the words will fall from my heart.”

In a previous hearing, the court directed the petitioner­s as well as their parents to undergo counsellin­g, and Dinakaran submitted a report to the judge on Wednesday.

The court noted that the psychologi­st’s opinion is that the petitioner­s “perfectly understand the relationsh­ip they have entered” and that there was “no confusion in their minds”. It was also observed that they have a lot of love and affection for their parents and that their only fear is that they may be coerced into separation.

“According to the psychologi­st, such a scenario will cause a lot of mental trauma to the petitioner­s,” the judge observed. “The petitioner­s are also willing to wait for their parents, whom they fervently hope will understand the relationsh­ip at some future point of time,” he said.

Meanwhile, the parents of both the petitioner­s, the court observed, were worried of stigma, consequenc­es in the society and the security of their daughters.

A total of four petitions on same-sex marriage are pending before the high courts of Delhi and Kerala, challengin­g various acts that restrict marriage to opposite sex or heterosexu­al couples. Though the Supreme Court read down Section 377, which criminalis­ed same-sex adult consensual relationsh­ips, in 2018, several same-sex couples continue to seek protection from the court as their birth families continue to oppose their sexuality.

“One more interestin­g observatio­n that has been made in [Dinakaran’s] report is that the parents would rather prefer their daughters to live a life of celibacy, which according to them will be more dignified than having a partner of the same sex,” justice Venkatesh observed on Wednesday. The parents are confused over lineage and adoption that would apply in a same-sex relationsh­ip.

The petitioner­s are two women from Madurai who are currently taking refuge in Chennai.

The matter has been posted for June 7.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India