Hindustan Times ST (Mumbai)

Novak faces threat of deportatio­n

World No 1 is locked in immigratio­n detention after his visa was cancelled for failure to comply with Oz entry requiremen­t

- Rutvick Mehta

MUMBAI: Novak Djokovic’s Australian Open title defence began with an upbeat social media post confirming his participat­ion on Tuesday and an accompanyi­ng smiling picture with his bags. A 14-four flight from Dubai to Melbourne ensued. What followed was an equally long and dramatic night at the Melbourne airport that ended on Thursday morning with the world’s top male tennis player locked in immigratio­n detention with the possibilit­y of deportatio­n from the country.

The Serb was refused entry into Australia to play the season-opening Grand Slam after his visa was cancelled for failing to “comply with our laws and entry requiremen­ts”, the Australian Border Force (ABF) said in a statement. After almost 10 hours of questionin­g, Djokovic was shifted to The Park Hotel in Carlton, where he will be in immigratio­n detention. The world No. 1 will remain there at least for four more days, after his legal team’s bid to challenge the revocation in the Federal Circuit Court secured an interim injunction until Monday, whe n t h e n e x t h e a r i n g is scheduled.

The standpoint stemmed from the medical exemption that Djokovic — who has publicly spoken about his stand against vaccines in the past — received from Tennis Australia and the state of Victoria under two independen­t medical panels in order to participat­e in the Grand Slam beginning January 17. Any person entering Australia is required to be fully vaccinated or present satisfacto­ry proof to complement the exemption in order to avoid a 14-day quarantine period upon arrival. Djokovic had neither.

“The ABF can confirm that Mr Djokovic failed to provide appropriat­e evidence to meet the entry requiremen­ts to Australia,” the ABF statement read.

Australian Prime Minister Scott Morrison, who tweeted “no one is above the rules” while announcing Djokovic’s visa cancellati­on, reiterated the reasoning behind the nine-time Australian Open champion’s treatment. “All I can say is that the evidence [for] medical exemption that was provided was found to be insufficie­nt,” Morrison told reporters.

The grounds for granting medical exemption, in compliance with the Australian Technical Advisory Group of Immunisati­on (ATAGI) are limited. It includes an acute medical condition and serious adverse effects previously caused by the Covid vaccine. Those who have recently contracted the virus can also get a temporary exemption.

Other exemptions also under scanner

Djokovic was not the only one who had applied for an exemption though. There were 26 other applicatio­ns in all filed by players and support staff. Though all informatio­n about these applicatio­ns are strictly confidenti­al, Tennis Australia’s chief medical officer confirmed that some of these applicatio­ns were s u c c e s s f u l , mos t l y because they came from people who had already had a Covid-19 infection in the last six months.

Here lies the catch, however. Australia’s federal health authoritie­s had twice written to Tennis Australia chief Craig Tiley in November that unvaccinat­ed people who had contracted Covid in the last six months would not be considered for exemption upon their arrival in Australia. “I can confirm that people who contracted Covid-19 within six months and seek to enter Australia from overseas, and have not received two doses of a Therapeuti­c Goods Administra­tion (Tga)-approved or Tga-recognised vaccine... are not considered fully vaccinated,” Health Minister Greg Hunt wrote to Tiley in a letter dated November 29.

It is learnt that the “handful” of players and support staff from the 26 applicants who were also granted exemption and are already in Australia will also now be investigat­ed further. However, according to a report in The Age quoting sources, Djokovic’s paperwork to support his exemption was “minimal” and “far less substantiv­e than that of the other player and official who entered the country with the same vaccine exemption”.

Usually, visas of the players scheduled to play in the tournament are approved through an automated process in November. Morrison added that other specific requiremen­ts, if any, to enter the country is separate and the sole responsibi­lity of the individual. The Prime Minister also added that Djokovic announcing his exemption approval on social media — no other player or support staff did that — and his previous comments on vaccine hesitancy did not help his cause. “When you get people making public statements—of what they say they have, and what they are going to do, and what their claims are—well they draw significan­t attention to themselves. Whoever does that, well they can expect to be asked questions more than others. That’s how Border Force works. They’re not singled out at all,” Morrison said.

Backlash

The perception that Djokovic was singled out for special treatment appeared to have angered the Australian public, which has had to endure months of one of the harshest and lengthiest lockdowns in the world in its fight against the pandemic. The issue has also touched political undercurre­nts, with Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic slamming Australia’s “maltreatme­nt” of the top-ranked pro, saying Djokovic was a victim of “harassment”. Djokovic’s father Srdjan Djokovic, who had threatened to hit the streets during Djokovic’s questionin­g, told Serbian media outlet Sputnik that “this is a fight for a libertaria­n world “.

Djokovic’s fellow players have so far stayed away from showing any sympathy for the Serb. Rafael Nadal, the Spaniard locked with Djokovic at 20 Grand Slam titles, said he felt sorry for Djokovic but added that he was well aware of the consequenc­es if he did not vaccinate.

“I don’t encourage nobody,” Nadal told reporters. “Everyone has to do what they feel is good for them but there are rules and without the vaccine there can be some troubles. He’s free to take his own position, but then there are consequenc­es.”

NOVEMBER

DECEMBER

JANUARY 4

JANUARY 5-6

JANUARY 6

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from India